364 () posted 2 years ago by Looking4Truth 2 years ago by Looking4Truth +368 / -4 497 comments share 497 comments share save hide report block hide replies
That's not what I said. Reading comprehension requires "reading".
Sometimes the red-pill can't be TL;DR'ed, or at least I don't always see how.
Using your logic. Proves that your an idiot and nobody knows nothing nohow and never will. But I forgot that you are enlightened and hold the answers because of your flattering detailed skills bullshittery
Would that be an attempted rebuttal of the argument I put forth?
I'm just trying to understand the purpose of your post.