That may be so, but I also still distinctly remember him being a huge advocate for socialism. He also popped into the spotlight seemingly overnight from genuine obscurity and, as I'm aware, he's still on yt and elsewhere. I think we all know by now the process these people have to go through just to become culturally relevant. I hope I'm wrong, trust me, but I seem to be right on Musk when people were lining up to suck his dick on tdw. But he might have changed.
I think your instincts are right. He has the whiff of controlled opposition. He is allegedly worth £15m which he won’t want to lose in a hurry. No more acting gigs but an ego that big needs an outlet hence the podcasts which as you say he gets to put out there unscathed despite claiming to be and demonstrably being “edgy”.
I dunno, Brand, in spite of his "Rebel without a care" persona, strikes me as the kind of person who sees the writing on the wall in bright screaming neon.
Soft prediction here, but the ball that started rolling with the WSJ is about to pick up speed.
give it a month, maybe three at most, and you're gonna see first a trickle, then a tidal wave of celebrities clamoring to get on the MAGA Express, or at the very least riding in its wake.
He only popped out of obscurity to us in the US. He was a fairly famous comedian in Britain for a while before making a name in the US. But, yes. I don’t trust anyone that made it in Hollywood and was married to a cabal puppet like Katy Perry. But I also am open minded that he could change and want to be a force of good. Maybe his strings are cut. Who knows.
You're right. Russell Brand is a hardcore socialist and general knobhead. However, he's a loose cannon. The UK government is ran by the Conservative Party. In reality they conserve nothing and are actually fairly socialist, but hardcore socialists regard them as far right. Russell Brand therefore hates the UK government.
It's therefore not a surprise that someone like Russell Brand would speak out against WuFlu propaganda, given that he hates the UK government and the UK government have been big promoters of WuFlu propaganda.
He didn't pop into the spotlight overnight. He was a presenter on obscure UK cable channels for a few years, then he became a presenter on the support show for Big Brother, then he gradually worked his way onto mainstream UK channels, then he got into Hollywood. He was already very famous in the UK before he got into Hollywood.
He shouldn't be trusted, though. I've read his first biography, and he openly admits he is a massive liar. Many of his stories involve him telling massive lies. In his biography he follows the idea 'if you're going to tell a lie, make it a big one'. For example, he was going to be fired from his job as a teacher of English to foreign students, due to absence, so he pretended he had AIDS to keep his job.
Russell has had a bit of an awakening in recent years. He might not be fully on the same page as us, but what we do have in common is that he doesn't like authority.
You gotta give him at least some credit for divorcing Katy Perry, though:
"The one thing we'll never be able to forget about their breakup, though, is the fact that Brand ended their marriage by text, like something out of one of Perry's songs. Lucky for Perry, though, Brand decided not to rob her of everything she was worth, taking nothing in their divorce settlement. He just left her a heartbroken divorcee by the age of 28."
He didn't take anything of hers -- was probably happy just to escape.
Perhaps. My worry is that he's nothing more than a planned future politician. I want to be optimistic, truly, but I feel like I've been penced too many times in the past while.
In his Netflix comedy special, he plays a clip of Trump saying Katy Perry is lucky to be rid of Russell 🤣 he was a good sport and said he liked Trump if I remember right.
I wonder how many relationships and marriages are controlled. I look at things differently now. Demi Lovato going non-binary? Hm.... Wonder who told her that was necessary for her to stay 'in heir good grafez'. Sometimes, I think it isstupid decisions an individual will make to stay relevant..... But I'm guessing that more often than not it is directed to continue a narrative or as a 'sacrifice' if some kind.
This begins to explain why you see so many marriages and divorces within the Hollywood crowd -- and why so many marriages seem like a mismatch from the get-go. It's a way to keep the stars in the news: shuffle the deck to keep things interesting and the normies will stay tuned in.
He's always struck me as a fame whore who gets hard off the idea of being the forty something rebeI. Maybe I'm being harsh but I've also been penced 5 times too many to take anybody on their word. Jordan Peterson, though? Heck yeah. The dude's based af.
right? Why is he the ONLY person not banned talking about all these subjects. Something is up and it’s got to be some sort of controlled opposition. I expect to see him do a complete 180 soon in an attempt to turn his audience to the “correct” side. It’s a marketing play.
Just like Tucker. We saw him cuck out during the erection. Idk why people forget this. Maybe I'll change my mind when he starts calling big names out instead of the Iowhanging fruit.
I don't trust him, tbh, but I do trust the truth. Whoever's mouth it comes from has little meaning to me.
Do you remember how Hollywood drug him through the mud saying he was in and out of rehab, and a drug addict. Seems like they casted him out.
That may be so, but I also still distinctly remember him being a huge advocate for socialism. He also popped into the spotlight seemingly overnight from genuine obscurity and, as I'm aware, he's still on yt and elsewhere. I think we all know by now the process these people have to go through just to become culturally relevant. I hope I'm wrong, trust me, but I seem to be right on Musk when people were lining up to suck his dick on tdw. But he might have changed.
I think your instincts are right. He has the whiff of controlled opposition. He is allegedly worth £15m which he won’t want to lose in a hurry. No more acting gigs but an ego that big needs an outlet hence the podcasts which as you say he gets to put out there unscathed despite claiming to be and demonstrably being “edgy”.
Oh what a world it is we live in that we call skepticism edgy, bahaha. The worst part is that you're not even wrong.
I dunno, Brand, in spite of his "Rebel without a care" persona, strikes me as the kind of person who sees the writing on the wall in bright screaming neon.
Soft prediction here, but the ball that started rolling with the WSJ is about to pick up speed.
give it a month, maybe three at most, and you're gonna see first a trickle, then a tidal wave of celebrities clamoring to get on the MAGA Express, or at the very least riding in its wake.
He only popped out of obscurity to us in the US. He was a fairly famous comedian in Britain for a while before making a name in the US. But, yes. I don’t trust anyone that made it in Hollywood and was married to a cabal puppet like Katy Perry. But I also am open minded that he could change and want to be a force of good. Maybe his strings are cut. Who knows.
You're right. Russell Brand is a hardcore socialist and general knobhead. However, he's a loose cannon. The UK government is ran by the Conservative Party. In reality they conserve nothing and are actually fairly socialist, but hardcore socialists regard them as far right. Russell Brand therefore hates the UK government.
It's therefore not a surprise that someone like Russell Brand would speak out against WuFlu propaganda, given that he hates the UK government and the UK government have been big promoters of WuFlu propaganda.
He didn't pop into the spotlight overnight. He was a presenter on obscure UK cable channels for a few years, then he became a presenter on the support show for Big Brother, then he gradually worked his way onto mainstream UK channels, then he got into Hollywood. He was already very famous in the UK before he got into Hollywood.
He shouldn't be trusted, though. I've read his first biography, and he openly admits he is a massive liar. Many of his stories involve him telling massive lies. In his biography he follows the idea 'if you're going to tell a lie, make it a big one'. For example, he was going to be fired from his job as a teacher of English to foreign students, due to absence, so he pretended he had AIDS to keep his job.
Russell has had a bit of an awakening in recent years. He might not be fully on the same page as us, but what we do have in common is that he doesn't like authority.
If he's anti-authoritiarian, it's odd how he ever considered himself a socialist. Maybe he turned leaf but I don't buy quite it.
You gotta give him at least some credit for divorcing Katy Perry, though:
"The one thing we'll never be able to forget about their breakup, though, is the fact that Brand ended their marriage by text, like something out of one of Perry's songs. Lucky for Perry, though, Brand decided not to rob her of everything she was worth, taking nothing in their divorce settlement. He just left her a heartbroken divorcee by the age of 28."
He didn't take anything of hers -- was probably happy just to escape.
https://www.thethings.com/the-truth-about-katy-perry-and-russell-brands-divorce/
I've got to take some of that credit away from him for marrying Katy in the first place.
Everyone makes mistakes, fren. At least he saw the light. ;-)
Perhaps. My worry is that he's nothing more than a planned future politician. I want to be optimistic, truly, but I feel like I've been penced too many times in the past while.
In his Netflix comedy special, he plays a clip of Trump saying Katy Perry is lucky to be rid of Russell 🤣 he was a good sport and said he liked Trump if I remember right.
I think he’s talked about being a Bernie Sanders guy. He’s definitely not a Biden fan though.
I wonder how many relationships and marriages are controlled. I look at things differently now. Demi Lovato going non-binary? Hm.... Wonder who told her that was necessary for her to stay 'in heir good grafez'. Sometimes, I think it isstupid decisions an individual will make to stay relevant..... But I'm guessing that more often than not it is directed to continue a narrative or as a 'sacrifice' if some kind.
This begins to explain why you see so many marriages and divorces within the Hollywood crowd -- and why so many marriages seem like a mismatch from the get-go. It's a way to keep the stars in the news: shuffle the deck to keep things interesting and the normies will stay tuned in.
Yeah, that’s what I’m thinking too
This guy has a series of excellent in depth interviews with Jordan Peterson and let's the man talk.
The comments are full of people LOVING IT and being open with each other.
That wins points in my book.
He's always struck me as a fame whore who gets hard off the idea of being the forty something rebeI. Maybe I'm being harsh but I've also been penced 5 times too many to take anybody on their word. Jordan Peterson, though? Heck yeah. The dude's based af.
He's certainly my favorite Canadian!
I was a big fan until he got jabbed and then promoted it, words to the effect “get the bloody jab”. Switched off after that.
Oh man, did he actually? That's freaking sad. I'll listen to his older work because, as I've said, the truth is what matters, not who says it.
I was honestly shocked when he mentioned Hunter’s laptop in this video.
right? Why is he the ONLY person not banned talking about all these subjects. Something is up and it’s got to be some sort of controlled opposition. I expect to see him do a complete 180 soon in an attempt to turn his audience to the “correct” side. It’s a marketing play.
Just like Tucker. We saw him cuck out during the erection. Idk why people forget this. Maybe I'll change my mind when he starts calling big names out instead of the Iowhanging fruit.