So I understand that if the whistleblower knew the passwords, he would have access to machine content, but for investigative purposes could not the people who control the EMS computer just go in and change the passwords to again render them inaccessible.
Yes. But the idea is as follows: whistleblower had key; whistleblower gave key; white hats used key to go inside and inventory everything; now white hats are telling you it was done and nothing is hidden any more; now that it's too late go ahead and change the locks. Could be a bluff, but that's what he's saying.
the image shows the system and password for each. which is why some is redacted
So I understand that if the whistleblower knew the passwords, he would have access to machine content, but for investigative purposes could not the people who control the EMS computer just go in and change the passwords to again render them inaccessible.
Yes. But the idea is as follows: whistleblower had key; whistleblower gave key; white hats used key to go inside and inventory everything; now white hats are telling you it was done and nothing is hidden any more; now that it's too late go ahead and change the locks. Could be a bluff, but that's what he's saying.
Understand, thanks.
yes. from the telegram posts, the whistleblower already documented what is protected.
Hopefully, he was a white hat plant all along.
Thanks, it was blurry and difficult to make out, even zoomed