It's a two birds, one stone situation.
-
Arizona Audit subpoena for the password is lapsed, which sets the stage.
-
White hats take time to put together all the info they have and create an imaginary plant in Dominion. It's very convincing that it comes from a whistleblower.
-
White Hats hand the info off to CodeMonkeyZ to ensure the news gets out quickly to avoid bureaucrats holding it up.
-
Dominion burns down their house to find the mole. Company heads start stabbing each other in the back and more whistleblowers come forward or start getting offed due to paranoia.
-
Arizona Auditors get the passwords, Dominion is proven by the whistleblower to have run the elections using a remote boot network, and the Supervisors can't claim the Auditors are the source of misinformation because the story has already broken ahead of time.
-
The Supervisors can only claim is that the whistleblower is fake. When the Auditors come in and prove otherwise, using the legit leaked passwords to get in to the systems, the jig is up. They cannot account for why a fake whistleblower has access to passwords that no one, not even the Judge, could get access to.
.
By the whistleblower coming in left-field and serving up the passwords, Dominion and the Supervisors are put in a position where they cannot dismiss the Auditor's findings. If the password works, then we know the whistleblower's data is real. If the whistleblower's data matches the Auditors, who had no contact with the whistleblower at all, then we know 100% they rigged the election. Two proofs lead to the same conclusion while operating in a vacuum.
Which leads to the two geese being fully cooked.
Either that's one hell of a stone toss, or the White Hats are behind it.
Thoughts?
It doesn't even have to be a real plant.
They probably got all this data from the Georgia run-offs and were holding off until the end of the audit.
A lot of the nutters claim that the run-offs had to happen because White Hats needed something very special from the network that they didn't get during the primary election in order to be able to control the narrative whiplash.
This might be that something very special.
Maybe but I'm confident from what I saw and then later what Q said that MI stopped the steal in 2016. You could see when it happened and the whole election started doing a 180° at 21:00 on election night. Hitlery was leading almost everywhere then Trump came charging out of the background and stomped her. The talking heads were blown away. In Q drop #14 Q said:
Was HRC next in line?
Was the ELECTION suppose to be rigged?
Did good people prevent the rigging?
It's one thing to pull the plug, and another all together to let it run and record everything.
Because they did un-rig it, they couldn't collect the necessary data.
Since Trump won, there would be no reason to pursue a rigged election case until you have the receipts.
Too many cards stacked against striking right then and there. Besides, tech changes, and they had every incentive to improve and prevent the un-rigging this time around. The data from 2016, what was collected, is assuredly out of date for the 2020 elections.
Might have us one of those situations where we CAN fabricate the existence of a whistleblower, because it doesn't matter if you lie to expose a bigger, deeper lie.
Fraud vitiates everything?
Love the way you think
Yup.
Considering the timing, and the thoroughness of the whistleblower's efforts to document everything, this seems too good for it not to be planned.
Why not come forward earlier? Why wait until after the auditors don't get the passwords? Why take it to an internet meme-thread mod as opposed to literally anyone else?
All questions with seriously nebulous answers.
As CodeMonkey asked: In all these months, why has a high-level Dominion sysadmin whistleblower never taken a step forward?
Then he answered the question: Today we learn the importance of timing and optics.
This whistleblower took pictures.
Looks like I'm not the only one thinking this way.
https://files.catbox.moe/tejgxr.png