100
posted ago by MAG768720 ago by MAG768720 +100 / -0

There is an ASSUMPTION being made that (a) a person takes a "Covid vaccine," then (b) gets flu-like symptoms, then (c) tests positive for Covid 19 (and this test might not even be done) ... that the person must be a "Breakthrough Case" (meaning they "got Covid" despite getting a "Covid vaccine").

At this point, ANOTHER ASSUMPTION is made that (a) this is some version of Covid 19, but not the original version, and therefore (b) must necessarily be a variant of Covid 19, which is being called "Delta Variant."

It is ALL based on lies.

  1. The first assumption is that a person gets a vaccine, then gets symptoms, and therefore must have a very unusual case of Covid 19, since they had a vaccine that should have prevented it. These are ALL lies.
  • The experimental drugs are NOT vaccines. They are not legally classified as vacines, and they are not actual vaccines in the sense that has been understood about what a vaccine is, for more than 100 years. There was no sample of SARS-CoV-2 put into any of the experimental drugs because ... NO SUCH SAMPLE EXISTS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.
  • The experimental drugs were NEVER TESTED to determine if they stop anyone from getting Covid 19 or any other illness
  • The experimental drugs were NEVER TESTED to determine if they would stop the spread of any illness
  • The experimental drugs were ONLY TESTED to determine if they would reduce symptoms of Covid 19
  • The claim that they DO reduce symptoms is ALSO a lie.
  • Therefore, the idea that getting an experimental drug that claims (falsely) to prevent symptoms, and then getting symptoms thereafter ... means NOTHING.
  1. The idea of a "Breakthrough Case" means that the drug did not work the way it was expected to work, and the person got the illness anyway. This is a lie, as well.
  • The drugs were ONLY tested as to reduction of symptoms, and those claims (that it does reduce them) are NOT true.
  • We do not KNOW if the people showing symptoms after drug injection have some form of Covid 19. That's because either they are not tested at all, or they are but the test is a fraudulent PCR test or a fraudulent antigen test. Neither test proves anything.
  • The only thing we can say for sure is that these people have flu-like symptoms. That is the ONLY thing that is known.
  • Since the experimental drugs were NOT tested as to whether or not they would prevent someone from getting a flu or any other illness, there is NO REASON to believe that the drugs played any role in PREVENTING anything.
  • They may have played a role in CAUSING something, but not in preventing.
  • There is no reason to believe that a "Breakthrough Case" is a real phenomenon. It appears to be nothing more than a made-up fantasy.
  1. The "Delta Variant" is proposed to be a version of Covid 19 that "survived the vaccines and mutated."
  • Since they are NOT vaccines, there is no "surviving the vaccine and mutated" to even discuss.
  • Since there is NO TEST for Delta Variant, there is no logical reason to believe such a thing exists.

Summary:

  • There is no such thing as a Covid vaccine. There are only experimental drugs.
  • These experimental drugs have NOT been tested as to whether or not they prevent anyone from getting any illness.
  • These experimental drugs have ONLY been tested to determine whether or not they reduce flu-like ("Covid-like") symptoms.
  • Although the drug makers claim that their drugs do reduce symptoms, their claims are false.
  • There is no logical reason to believe that a person who (a) takes an experimental drug and (b) then comes down with flu-like symptoms is either a "Covid case" or a "Breakthrough Case."
  • There is no logical reason to believe that a "Breakthrough Case" exists at all. There is only reason to believe that it is a made-up fantasy.
  • There is no test for Delta Variant. FULL STOP.
  • Therefore, there is no reason that anyone who is claimed to have "Delta Variant" actually has it, or if it even exists (it might just be yet another made-up fantasy in this web of lies).

There IS reason to believe that people who took one or more experimental drugs have gotten sick -- and even died -- after taking them. This fact alone is reason to investigate the drugs and the drug makers to see if the drugs are what are making people sick, and possibly killing people.

This concludes your regularly scheduled Public Service Announcement.

Carry on.