I think you get it. My point was that I think the enticements of affordability and freedom that you mentioned offered in certain states are being deliberately and possibly even falsely heralded as solutions to the problem.
They are being advertised by the leaders of the free states with almost (to me) what seems like the same type of marketing as the donuts and lottery tickets were being marketed to the general public to increase vaccine acceptance. In short, "Show me the incentive and I will show you the behavior."
If both widespread acceptance of vaccines and mass migration out of "blue" states accomplish different parts of the same overarching Agenda 21 goals I would like to do my part to not make it so easy on them by not participating in either.
I would love it if protecting my son's future and his freedom were as easy as fleeing California. I do believe that option could buy my particular family some time but given their stated plans in Agenda 21 and not knowing the level of acceptance, participation and buy in that these "free state" governors may have in the larger plan, I am not at all confident that our freedoms in those states would be lasting either. Perhaps I'm just a pessimist.
I found it deeply troubling that Rand Paul did not vote in favor of Trump during the Presidential debacle. Does anyone remember that? I realize he's a hero at the moment for calling out Fauci.
I followed Rand's dad, Ron, for several years and felt like he we was more transparent that his son.
Why didn't Rand support Trump as our legitimate President if Rand is on team America and freedom? Was his voting against Trump part of the plan to ensure this period of awakening could happen? Was it a signal that Trump is not who we think he is? Does anyone else remember that "betrayal" by Rand and have thoughts on it?
Yes, I remember Rand's betrayal. I also remember he voted against Trump's border wall funding a few years back because he's supposedly against any kind of government spending, yet he voted to increase military spending by billions of dollars TWICE during the Obama years. He's a big fat hypocrite that likes to play the libertarian card when it suits him.
I think you get it. My point was that I think the enticements of affordability and freedom that you mentioned offered in certain states are being deliberately and possibly even falsely heralded as solutions to the problem.
They are being advertised by the leaders of the free states with almost (to me) what seems like the same type of marketing as the donuts and lottery tickets were being marketed to the general public to increase vaccine acceptance. In short, "Show me the incentive and I will show you the behavior." If both widespread acceptance of vaccines and mass migration out of "blue" states accomplish different parts of the same overarching Agenda 21 goals I would like to do my part to not make it so easy on them by not participating in either.
I would love it if protecting my son's future and his freedom were as easy as fleeing California. I do believe that option could buy my particular family some time but given their stated plans in Agenda 21 and not knowing the level of acceptance, participation and buy in that these "free state" governors may have in the larger plan, I am not at all confident that our freedoms in those states would be lasting either. Perhaps I'm just a pessimist.
I found it deeply troubling that Rand Paul did not vote in favor of Trump during the Presidential debacle. Does anyone remember that? I realize he's a hero at the moment for calling out Fauci.
I followed Rand's dad, Ron, for several years and felt like he we was more transparent that his son.
Why didn't Rand support Trump as our legitimate President if Rand is on team America and freedom? Was his voting against Trump part of the plan to ensure this period of awakening could happen? Was it a signal that Trump is not who we think he is? Does anyone else remember that "betrayal" by Rand and have thoughts on it?
Yes, I remember Rand's betrayal. I also remember he voted against Trump's border wall funding a few years back because he's supposedly against any kind of government spending, yet he voted to increase military spending by billions of dollars TWICE during the Obama years. He's a big fat hypocrite that likes to play the libertarian card when it suits him.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who remembers and sees that. Really does feel like we are watching a movie. It is all a distraction.