For anyone seeking clarity on the big picture explanation of what is going on and what we can actually do about it, Rosa Koire's book Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21 really helps with that.
Two day min time commitment to get thru that one.
For those who are not big readers or don't have time, here is a 30 minute interview that summarizes key points.
One of the most helpful things in the interview, I thought, was the clarification about what Agenda 21 actually is. Agenda 21 is the broad overview, a Masterplan if you will, of goals for the 21st Century. Unlike what we have been told, Agenda 30 isn't a new plan to replace Agenda 21. Agenda 30 and Agenda 50 are sub plans within the Master Agenda 21 plan that set out target dates (2030 and 2050) for certain specific goals to be achieved that will aid in completing all the goals of the larger Agenda 21 objectives during the 21st century.
I thought it was also helpful to see that part of their short term plan is to drive voluntary migration into select areas of the country where "patriots" will ultimately be easier to manage because they are consolidated. This, more than anything else, makes me want to stay right where I am in California, knowing that things will get very ugly here, to fight and make it more difficult for them to achieve their goals. Brendan O'Connell has been attacked by fact checkers on Google, but he has been saying for some time now that they are going to let the "blue" states burn and drive migration of the "trumptards" to areas where it will be easier to manage us.
They were not my words....I'm just restating what Brendan O'Connell shared in his video. In trying to look at the thing objectively, it does seem that Conservatives are taking the same candy and lottery tickets offered to flee their "blue states" that Liberals were offered to incentivize their acceptance of the jabs.
Candy and lottery tickets? More like affordability and freedom. It's the entitled handout culture conservatives are moving away from. But you're right, the faster conservatives flee the battlefield, the quicker their side wins. Once conservatives are isolated to only the heartland of America, they'll flood it with migrants until we're staunchly outnumbered. For a preview into their ideal future, see South Africa.
I think you get it. My point was that I think the enticements of affordability and freedom that you mentioned offered in certain states are being deliberately and possibly even falsely heralded as solutions to the problem.
They are being advertised by the leaders of the free states with almost (to me) what seems like the same type of marketing as the donuts and lottery tickets were being marketed to the general public to increase vaccine acceptance. In short, "Show me the incentive and I will show you the behavior."
If both widespread acceptance of vaccines and mass migration out of "blue" states accomplish different parts of the same overarching Agenda 21 goals I would like to do my part to not make it so easy on them by not participating in either.
I would love it if protecting my son's future and his freedom were as easy as fleeing California. I do believe that option could buy my particular family some time but given their stated plans in Agenda 21 and not knowing the level of acceptance, participation and buy in that these "free state" governors may have in the larger plan, I am not at all confident that our freedoms in those states would be lasting either. Perhaps I'm just a pessimist.
I found it deeply troubling that Rand Paul did not vote in favor of Trump during the Presidential debacle. Does anyone remember that? I realize he's a hero at the moment for calling out Fauci.
I followed Rand's dad, Ron, for several years and felt like he we was more transparent that his son.
Why didn't Rand support Trump as our legitimate President if Rand is on team America and freedom? Was his voting against Trump part of the plan to ensure this period of awakening could happen? Was it a signal that Trump is not who we think he is? Does anyone else remember that "betrayal" by Rand and have thoughts on it?
But if they flee to Red States how can they control them, when very likely those States either tell the Feds to FO and maintain State Rights, or they'll secede in the end. Assuming they stay Red of course.
I don't know why people are downvoting your question. You can msg Brendan O'Connell to ask him why he used the term trumptard if it is offensive to you and you want to know why he used it. I personally was not offended by his language. Brendan is responsive but he is not overly tolerant of any questions he deems unimportant or of people who are not leaving their homes to do something about what is going on. Just giving you fair warning lol. Maybe you'll have great success in your interaction with him.
No-- I'm saying it is not offensive to me. Few "names" offend me. Someone calls me a name, I figure they are either frustrated with my statements or sharing the joke with me that name calling is silly.
I just wanted to know if those states/area were the consolidation points, that is all.
For anyone seeking clarity on the big picture explanation of what is going on and what we can actually do about it, Rosa Koire's book Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21 really helps with that.
Two day min time commitment to get thru that one. For those who are not big readers or don't have time, here is a 30 minute interview that summarizes key points.
https://files.catbox.moe/ct6ta8.mp4
One of the most helpful things in the interview, I thought, was the clarification about what Agenda 21 actually is. Agenda 21 is the broad overview, a Masterplan if you will, of goals for the 21st Century. Unlike what we have been told, Agenda 30 isn't a new plan to replace Agenda 21. Agenda 30 and Agenda 50 are sub plans within the Master Agenda 21 plan that set out target dates (2030 and 2050) for certain specific goals to be achieved that will aid in completing all the goals of the larger Agenda 21 objectives during the 21st century.
I thought it was also helpful to see that part of their short term plan is to drive voluntary migration into select areas of the country where "patriots" will ultimately be easier to manage because they are consolidated. This, more than anything else, makes me want to stay right where I am in California, knowing that things will get very ugly here, to fight and make it more difficult for them to achieve their goals. Brendan O'Connell has been attacked by fact checkers on Google, but he has been saying for some time now that they are going to let the "blue" states burn and drive migration of the "trumptards" to areas where it will be easier to manage us.
Thanks for that link 👍🏽
I'm holding down the fort with you in BEAUTIFUL California for Americans!!!!!
Thank you! Please don't leave!
The consolidation of trumptards to the midwest, tx & fl?
They were not my words....I'm just restating what Brendan O'Connell shared in his video. In trying to look at the thing objectively, it does seem that Conservatives are taking the same candy and lottery tickets offered to flee their "blue states" that Liberals were offered to incentivize their acceptance of the jabs.
Candy and lottery tickets? More like affordability and freedom. It's the entitled handout culture conservatives are moving away from. But you're right, the faster conservatives flee the battlefield, the quicker their side wins. Once conservatives are isolated to only the heartland of America, they'll flood it with migrants until we're staunchly outnumbered. For a preview into their ideal future, see South Africa.
I think you get it. My point was that I think the enticements of affordability and freedom that you mentioned offered in certain states are being deliberately and possibly even falsely heralded as solutions to the problem.
They are being advertised by the leaders of the free states with almost (to me) what seems like the same type of marketing as the donuts and lottery tickets were being marketed to the general public to increase vaccine acceptance. In short, "Show me the incentive and I will show you the behavior." If both widespread acceptance of vaccines and mass migration out of "blue" states accomplish different parts of the same overarching Agenda 21 goals I would like to do my part to not make it so easy on them by not participating in either.
I would love it if protecting my son's future and his freedom were as easy as fleeing California. I do believe that option could buy my particular family some time but given their stated plans in Agenda 21 and not knowing the level of acceptance, participation and buy in that these "free state" governors may have in the larger plan, I am not at all confident that our freedoms in those states would be lasting either. Perhaps I'm just a pessimist.
I found it deeply troubling that Rand Paul did not vote in favor of Trump during the Presidential debacle. Does anyone remember that? I realize he's a hero at the moment for calling out Fauci.
I followed Rand's dad, Ron, for several years and felt like he we was more transparent that his son.
Why didn't Rand support Trump as our legitimate President if Rand is on team America and freedom? Was his voting against Trump part of the plan to ensure this period of awakening could happen? Was it a signal that Trump is not who we think he is? Does anyone else remember that "betrayal" by Rand and have thoughts on it?
But if they flee to Red States how can they control them, when very likely those States either tell the Feds to FO and maintain State Rights, or they'll secede in the end. Assuming they stay Red of course.
Simply a ? -- & the term trumptard is as meaningless to me as deplorable, b****, etc.
Why are ppl down voting a question? I was not able to watch the video-- must be what he said.
I don't know why people are downvoting your question. You can msg Brendan O'Connell to ask him why he used the term trumptard if it is offensive to you and you want to know why he used it. I personally was not offended by his language. Brendan is responsive but he is not overly tolerant of any questions he deems unimportant or of people who are not leaving their homes to do something about what is going on. Just giving you fair warning lol. Maybe you'll have great success in your interaction with him.
No-- I'm saying it is not offensive to me. Few "names" offend me. Someone calls me a name, I figure they are either frustrated with my statements or sharing the joke with me that name calling is silly.
I just wanted to know if those states/area were the consolidation points, that is all.
Thx for responding, tho.