"Six percent of Florida’s COVID-19 cases in the past month have been among vaccinated individuals, Weesam Khoury, spokesperson for the state Department of Health, said in an emailed statement last week."
This is a polar opposite. Granted while I think this is BS numbers (because they are changing the thresholds / not testing vaccinated to skew the results), the point i'm trying to make is that it looks like someone is changing what the spokesperson said. I think this is purposeful misinformation to discredit us.
This recent CDC study shows 74% of cases are amongst vaccinated in a population with 69% vaccination rate. It shows that 4/5 of the hospitalization cases were vaccination (and the one unvaccinated person had underlying conditions). It shows that the viral load (ability to transmit to others) between vaccinated and unvaccinated is similar.
"Third, demographics of cases likely reflect those of attendees at the public gatherings, as events were marketed to adult male participants; further study is underway to identify other population characteristics among cases, such as additional demographic characteristics and underlying health conditions including immunocompromising conditions.*** "
I found this from about a week ago:
"Six percent of Florida’s COVID-19 cases in the past month have been among vaccinated individuals, Weesam Khoury, spokesperson for the state Department of Health, said in an emailed statement last week."
This is a polar opposite. Granted while I think this is BS numbers (because they are changing the thresholds / not testing vaccinated to skew the results), the point i'm trying to make is that it looks like someone is changing what the spokesperson said. I think this is purposeful misinformation to discredit us.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/covid-19-cases-spiking-again-100300574.html
EDIT:
A FAR better example is CDC report: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7031e2-H.pdf
This recent CDC study shows 74% of cases are amongst vaccinated in a population with 69% vaccination rate. It shows that 4/5 of the hospitalization cases were vaccination (and the one unvaccinated person had underlying conditions). It shows that the viral load (ability to transmit to others) between vaccinated and unvaccinated is similar.
Note that CDC is up to its old tricks again, lumping together "not fully vaccinated" and "unknowns" into the "unvaccinated" category.
Yep. If they didn't ask 10% of the people, then those are all basically counted as unvaccinated. Which is just plain dishonest.
I just noticed this in the MMWR article:
"Third, demographics of cases likely reflect those of attendees at the public gatherings, as events were marketed to adult male participants; further study is underway to identify other population characteristics among cases, such as additional demographic characteristics and underlying health conditions including immunocompromising conditions.*** "
So, do you think this was a Gay Pride thing?
I heard on the radio a few days ago that someone make a statement about this, and then later said the opposite and that the original was a mistake.
I don't remember which was which, because I was only casually listening, and it caught my attention almost after the fact.
So, it needs to be looked into more, for sure.
That was UK stating 60% of hospitalizations were vaccinated, then "correcting" to 60% of hospitalizations were unvaccinated.