What does 95% effective mean? It means in the study 0.7534% of unvaccinated caught COVID and 0.0372%. of vaccinated did. Absolute risk reduction is 0.71%. Relative risk reduction is 0.0372% (risk of getting covid if vaccinated) / 0.7534%(risk of getting covid unvaccinated) = 0.049. "Relative" risk reduction = 1-.049 = 95.1%.
In numbers, of 20,000 patient cohorts, 150 would get Covid in the unvaccinated, and 7 people would get Covid in the vaccinated group.
But I thought currently, certainly in my country they are reporting about 64% are vaccinated that are in hospital?
And from my Governments own statistics they quote a survivability percentage for those 70 and under with no other issues at 99.98%.
Am I misunderstanding something here, thanks for the workings.
PS where have all the influenza A and B deaths gone, and why the need to be labelled "died with covid in the last 28 days" and not "died from covid" as it seems an easy way to juggle statistics?
What does 95% effective mean? It means in the study 0.7534% of unvaccinated caught COVID and 0.0372%. of vaccinated did. Absolute risk reduction is 0.71%. Relative risk reduction is 0.0372% (risk of getting covid if vaccinated) / 0.7534%(risk of getting covid unvaccinated) = 0.049. "Relative" risk reduction = 1-.049 = 95.1%.
In numbers, of 20,000 patient cohorts, 150 would get Covid in the unvaccinated, and 7 people would get Covid in the vaccinated group.
https://greahttpstawakening.win/p/12jJPv3MkS/
But I thought currently, certainly in my country they are reporting about 64% are vaccinated that are in hospital?
And from my Governments own statistics they quote a survivability percentage for those 70 and under with no other issues at 99.98%.
Am I misunderstanding something here, thanks for the workings.
PS where have all the influenza A and B deaths gone, and why the need to be labelled "died with covid in the last 28 days" and not "died from covid" as it seems an easy way to juggle statistics?