It's been known for a while that individual printers can be tracked by specialized marks a printer makes on pages, similar to a water mark. It's not super wasy, more likely in the realm of Intel agencies, but still possible.
all the actual real mail in ballots had watermark but that didn't stopped them counting them multiple time, the machine has no security measure to detect duplicates
Ah, I understand. You are correct. Just saying there is such thing as printer fingerprinting, it's an interesting kinda nerdy thing concerning privacy is all. Just wanted to make people aware it exists.
But wait! I thought Kameltoe said that POC don't have technology? Won't they need a Kinkos to print it?
So can a person print 20,000 copies at home then?
This better not happen or be allowed
This is not audit proof. Still have to be verifiably eligible to vote and if people are downloading it, it can be tracked.
It's been known for a while that individual printers can be tracked by specialized marks a printer makes on pages, similar to a water mark. It's not super wasy, more likely in the realm of Intel agencies, but still possible.
Yeah look at the problem that we are having trying to prove that
What do you mean?
all the actual real mail in ballots had watermark but that didn't stopped them counting them multiple time, the machine has no security measure to detect duplicates
Ah, I understand. You are correct. Just saying there is such thing as printer fingerprinting, it's an interesting kinda nerdy thing concerning privacy is all. Just wanted to make people aware it exists.
That's a dude
nah...thats just one REAL FUGLY COMMIE!
but but...I thought they didn't know how to use a fax/printer, or even have one??? Sumpin better be done or CALI is gonna go apeshit mad!!