MIKE LINDELL'S CYBER SYMPOSIUM ON FRANK SPEECH! LIVE STREAM AUG 10-12!!
(lindelltv.com)
BREAKING NEWS
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (1744)
sorted by:
Thanks for the clarification. I probably listened to about 8 hours of this today while working on chores here and there. You say he clearly said that yet I missed it and I know others who were also unaware of the situation. You can't expect everyone to start watching when he mentions that especially given it's a 12hour stream. He could have made that extremely obvious with an * or footnote at the bottom yet they didn't. I see people even here sharing the pictures of the maps and which bothers me since it's definitely not "The Truth" since we know there were tons of physical fraud. Look at this thread. You can clearly see people unaware of what exactly that information represents. https://greatawakening.win/p/12jvu9QVgD/lindell-is-legit-because-he-is-s/c/
The presentation today was filled with information but was presented extremely disorganized. He said he had big news at 7pm central yet he invites a Virginia state senator on stage at the same time right in the middle of it? I like Lindell but you can't honestly believe that this presentation should not have been more polished especially given how much money was sunk into the research.
I think I can clarify my statement from yesterday. (I think this is right place)
The machine vote issue was completely controlled by an algorithm, but as I understand it now, it was not a static algorithm. From what I just heard the lady say, she said that their was some sort of supervisory input or adjustment to the algorithm due to Trumps vote totals being much higher that originally planned for.
Are you familiar with Edward Solomon? They mentioned him and I saw his videos probably at the end of the last year. From my interpretation they were pulling votes from a set of different precincts constantly in order to get the number that they wanted. This important because they also refused to report precinct data for the first time in decades to my knowledge. My guess is they did this because the precincts are smallest part of the data set so by refusing to report them they were able to steal and add as many fake votes that they needed. You can think of this as not having 10,000 votes in a precinct that only had 5,000 individuals which is obviously not possible even though we have seen counties with more votes than possible thanks to mail in voting, Richard Baris briefly spoke about the importance of precincts so this is also my own interpretation
The fact that the algorithm likely had human interactions would indicate it was connected to the internet (we know that already).
I follow what you saying. The Dr. whatchamacallit I think presented the same scheme.
Instead of saying, "He clearly said...", I can at least say that "this is what I understood him to say."
I am not far off to claim that he said those things, and when taken on the whole, I believe that anyone upon hearing the same presentation, would believe as I do.
I can try and relisted to video and reply with snippets if you wish. I hope there is also a recorded transscript made of what was said, but I don't know.
I'm sure he did say it but it's not by any means clear especially on the slides which were essentially the focal point for each state. I know at least 4 people including myself who were not sure what he was referring to so I cannot agree with that statement. Perhaps if everyone were able to devote their complete attention to every word that was said they may all believe the same way but you have to realize people have kids, lives, and other distractions that can grab your attention for even a brief moment and take away from hearing that. Honestly I didn't even hear him say that. I only know because of my knowledge on the other levels of fraud. I don't need vods to prove your point of him stating it as I am not doubting you. I am saying that it is not clear by any means (I know you changed it afterwards but my point is people who share this information can and will get the wrong idea). Look at the thread I linked. You have someone directly linking a slide yet it's clear based on the comments that not everyone sees that picture with your knowledge at hand.
That happens when people don't watch the entirety of something.
I understand it's long, and people have jobs and responsibilities, I get that and I'm not faulting anyone that didn't watch the whole thing.
Lord knows we all miss stuff another will catch in much simpler situations. And always there is more to be learned
But if you didn't watch the whole thing, you know you might have missed something anything a nuance... just be patient. and don't add negative comments or jump on someone else.
And if you did watch the whole thing we still don't have the whole picture yet.
Emotions are high, people are stressed. We are all in this together.
Dan Bongino's 24 hour rule is a good one.
He said 80m different visits were on his webpages. Even though he himself admits not all of those are legitimate viewers thanks to things such as ddos. You yourself are saying that you know we miss things. I am not being negative. I am saying he SHOULD have added certain things to clarify things as people are spreading the maps now as evidence when we know that is just another part of the story. It's even more absurd cause it says "The Truth" on it.
Do you also think it's a good idea to try doing basic subtraction of 7 digit numbers live in front of millions of people? Again him or his team could have easily done the math there ahead of time but they chose not to do it. Instead you have him saying the wrong number multiple times which just looks plain sloppy. Again I have nothing but respect for Mike and his team but you have to realize I'm just a random guy who could have polished this for them. I am not on the payroll or volunteering my time. The fact that they did not do this is ridiculous as I could have without a doubt did all of this for them in under an hour. I am not asking for much by asking for a tiny disclaimer on each slide saying "This does not include organic voting fraud such as mail in ballots, dead voters, etc".
We are all in this together. We need to get back to communicating effectively which starts with getting accurate and attention grabbing pictures or data out there for everyone to see.