I don't require "beliefs"; I don't ever really "believe" anything, but I do require enough evidential support for the decision making process. In the case of the whole Jew/Synagogue of Satan/WWII/Holocaust/Illuminati/Freemasons/Zion/everything related to the really big historical events for the past couple centuries (and beyond of course) I have seen so much conflicting, good evidence that I can't make actionable decisions on any of it.
So I don't need beliefs, but it would be nice to get to "preponderance of the evidence" one way or another on some of it.
That "preponderance of evidence" is still only a small part of the factual reality, but our belief system makes us think that such a preponderance of evidence is enough to make it a factual reality. But its still a subjective reality that you believe with all your heart.
I don't require "beliefs"; I don't ever really "believe" anything, but I do require enough evidential support for the decision making process. In the case of the whole Jew/Synagogue of Satan/WWII/Holocaust/Illuminati/Freemasons/Zion/everything related to the really big historical events for the past couple centuries (and beyond of course) I have seen so much conflicting, good evidence that I can't make actionable decisions on any of it.
So I don't need beliefs, but it would be nice to get to "preponderance of the evidence" one way or another on some of it.
That "preponderance of evidence" is still only a small part of the factual reality, but our belief system makes us think that such a preponderance of evidence is enough to make it a factual reality. But its still a subjective reality that you believe with all your heart.
Bah, don't waste your time, BB. This guy never thinks he's wrong.