Question for anyone that can help me understand ……… if the PCAPS show the fraud, why would there still be the need for a forensic audit? ( they just said this on the symposium) I thought this symposium w/PCAPS was the MOAB of detecting fraud and showing the results.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
If you show the ballots versus results via audit, you can price incorrect results and throw out the counters because of stupidity. If you show that the PCaps intentionally changed votes, you show foreign interference. If you show that the domestic vote counters and reporters helped make the PCaps happen, you have demonstrated treason.
Because there are multiple crimes and criminals.
PCAPs demonstrate lies from two of the deceptions...
Forensic Audits demonstrate lies from politicians+elections officials+workers+voting machine deficiencies.
Exactly, plus, with the images, you can prove what happened intentionally on the systems, configurations, match with the pcaps etc
Just the network traffic can proof some stuffs, but hard to prove in network without the routers or servers
The biggest thing about the packet captures is that it proves the machines were connected to the internet. Hopefully, it shows traffic from the machines to the controllers. If the criminals were careful, the traffic won't trace back to China or any other important actor. Q says these people are stupid, so perhaps the packet captures do show traffic from the machines back to China during the voting.
Lindell just explained we need to see the ground story....the organic fraud.
pcaps arent as good as the actual ballots and machines and machine images. pcaps could be spun as manipulated in the same way they claim votes were flipped digitally. this was gone over in the show. its good corroboration and a nice lead. ALL of this stuff together is real damn hard to not be struck hard by.
I would think the P-caps would be support for the audit...
There were layers of fraud in many areas, We need to see 'The Rest of the Story', ie., we need to understand the hows, the whos, not just the whys and the wheres.
PCAPS won't bring out all the ballot issues, which have always been exploited.
Ok, thanks everyone….a better understanding!