I'm not quite on-board with your assessing this case. I believe she may have made the correct decision. The States have traditionally regulated vaXXXination. The students already have a religious exemption that they could use. Here is the Indiana Code.
IC 21-40-5-6Religious objections
Sec. 6. (a) Except as otherwise provided, a student may not be required to undergo testing, examination, immunization, or treatment required under this chapter when the student objects on religious grounds.
(b) A religious objection does not exempt a student from testing, examination, immunization, or treatment required under this chapter unless the request for an exemption is:
(1) made in writing;
(2) signed by the student; and
(3) delivered to the individual who might order a test, an examination, an immunization, or a treatment absent the religious objection.
Furthermore, they could have used a medical condition as well.
IC 21-40-5-4Exemption from immunization
Sec. 4. An exemption relieving a student from the requirements of section 3 of this chapter may be accepted by the state educational institution as part of the documentation of exemption for the following reasons:
(1) If a health care provider makes a written statement indicating the nature and probable duration of a medical condition or circumstances that contraindicate an immunization, identifying the specific vaccine that could be detrimental to the student's health.
(2) If pregnancy or suspected pregnancy is certified in a written statement from a health care provider.
(3) If a health care provider provides written documentation that the student is in the course of completing an approved schedule of all necessary doses of the vaccines required for the diseases listed in section 2 of this chapter.
If the student's medical condition or circumstances subsequently permit immunization, the exemptions granted by this section terminate and the student shall obtain the immunizations from which the student has been exempted.
I believe these students may have been working for the enemy and wanted to SCOTUS to rule on mandatory vaXXXination. The precedent has been leaning toward mandatory vaXXXination since the early part of last Century.
Agree with you. We can’t make a true assessment in her overall juris prudence without knowing details for all we know they didn’t meet the standards for the court to hear the case. We aren’t leftist let’s find out facts before pitchforking. Grabs pitchfork
When Dianne Feinstein praised ACB during the 'inquisition,' I knew what she was there for.
She, along with Roberts, will prove that just because an individual is a "(R)epublican," or rather more importantly "on the same side as you," does NOT mean your rights will remain safe.
Only an awake and aware citizenry can prevent and obstruct corrupt individuals from usurping their Constitutional protections.
On the basis that a religious exemption is allowed. We need to push the religious exemption across the board. there is scotus precedent for this. Fight smarter.
How the mighty have fallen. Once celebrated as a hero is now no more than another cog in the cabal's plans. She should change her name to Judas at this point. Blood is in her hands.
When I heard Donald Trump announce that "the next SC would be a woman" before he had picked anyone, I knew there was trouble. Not because she is a woman. But because DJT was going to announce a pick based on a persons identity, rather than merit, and I knew he had cut a deal with the filthy republican party establishment to place a woman on the SC for party optics. That's what working with the (R) party instead of the patriotic US citizenry earns you- uni-party loyalist traitors in every level of government.
We knew she was controlled opposition, right?..she stinks of closet liberal....
I'm not quite on-board with your assessing this case. I believe she may have made the correct decision. The States have traditionally regulated vaXXXination. The students already have a religious exemption that they could use. Here is the Indiana Code.
Furthermore, they could have used a medical condition as well.
I believe these students may have been working for the enemy and wanted to SCOTUS to rule on mandatory vaXXXination. The precedent has been leaning toward mandatory vaXXXination since the early part of last Century.
Thanks for the dig on this Tewdryg. Very informative. Thank you for taking the effort to explain in detail.
Here is some more sauce from another source.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/08/12/breaking-supreme-court-justice-amy-coney-barrett-approves-forced-covid-vaccinations-for-indiana-college-students/
Agree with you. We can’t make a true assessment in her overall juris prudence without knowing details for all we know they didn’t meet the standards for the court to hear the case. We aren’t leftist let’s find out facts before pitchforking. Grabs pitchfork
I don't like it, and you don't like it.
When Dianne Feinstein praised ACB during the 'inquisition,' I knew what she was there for.
She, along with Roberts, will prove that just because an individual is a "(R)epublican," or rather more importantly "on the same side as you," does NOT mean your rights will remain safe.
Only an awake and aware citizenry can prevent and obstruct corrupt individuals from usurping their Constitutional protections.
On the basis that a religious exemption is allowed. We need to push the religious exemption across the board. there is scotus precedent for this. Fight smarter.
It is up to us. All these colleges/universities care about is money - it is THE only language they understand.
Do not attend a university that requires the jab - only about 10% are doing so. They will not get the message if the message is never sent!
This! Don't attend, don't support their sports, don't give to the universities. Same for hospital systems and businesses.
Who in the hell pushed her??
Gallows for her then.
How the mighty have fallen. Once celebrated as a hero is now no more than another cog in the cabal's plans. She should change her name to Judas at this point. Blood is in her hands.
They threatened her family day 1
then you dont put yourself in the line of fire
they did make a promise to the american people and others in line wouldnt have the same concerns
When I heard Donald Trump announce that "the next SC would be a woman" before he had picked anyone, I knew there was trouble. Not because she is a woman. But because DJT was going to announce a pick based on a persons identity, rather than merit, and I knew he had cut a deal with the filthy republican party establishment to place a woman on the SC for party optics. That's what working with the (R) party instead of the patriotic US citizenry earns you- uni-party loyalist traitors in every level of government.