BREAKING – supreme court justice amy coney barrett Approves Forced COVID Vaccinations for Indiana College Students
(theconservativetreehouse.com)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
This comment on the page gives more explanation.
Some comfort there. Thanks for sharing.
Yep, often times the real reason for many rulings doesn't make a good headline.
And in the meantime students at Indiana will suffer. How many more will suffer while we wait YEARS for it to get to the court. She is a ccp plant placed there by Mitch McConnell!
This.
Looking to me more and more like Barrett was part of the Haiti human trafficking cartel. Placed onto the SC by DJT so she could show her true colors and get a free ticket to Gitmo.
They only allowed it because they put in so many exemptions that opposing it on legal grounds was essentially moot.
Yeah, not the victory we wanted, but a victory nonetheless.
So one needs to be anti-vaxx to be conservative now?
I would say so, yes - at least in regards to the covid 'vaccines'. Anyone who claims to be pro-life can't possibly support these nanotech DNA-altering clot shots.
Having said that, I think a conservative can support many of the old-school vaccines like for tetanus and rubella. Those obviously don't kill and maim in large numbers -- though I question how necessary they are, and whether their benefits truly outweigh their risks.
I would disagree.
Based on what science?
https://usamagazinestudio.com/reports-from-israel-australia-claim-95-99-of-hospitalized-covid-19-cases-are-fully-vaccinated/
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cdc-covid-19-coronavirus-vaccine-side-effects-hospitalization-kids-11626706868
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/wakeup-call-pfizer-vax-only-42-effective-against-infection-july
Hey now.. you know science only counts if it's from official state mouthpieces and concurs with the propaganda.... Careful there sure!
Definitely not the science of media websites.
No, just anti-coercion.
But hey, the government only exists because of coercion - so no conservative is as conservative as they believe.
Also being skeptical of COVID-19 injections does not make someone "anti-vaxx". You seem to have forgotten that vaccines existed before COVID came along.
Nothing wrong with being skeptical, but I doubt the case ACB reviewed was asking her to be skeptical. In fact, the article doesn’t even give a brief on the grounds of the lawsuit.
The title reaks of click-bait.