I THINK THIS IS TELLING US DURHAM IS ALSO LOOKING INTO ELECTION INTERFERENCE.
Otherwise, this letter makes no sense.
He says he is tolling the notification provisions in 28 CFR Chapter VI, of 600.9(a)(1), pursuant to the investigative and privacy provisions in 600.9 (b) until "at least after the Nov. 3 election." But 9(a)(1) is a notification "upon appointing a Special Counsel" and the first page of his letter says the Special Counsel was appointed in May, 2019. The letter "tolling" notification is dated October 19, 2020.
So was he saying he was appointing the Special Counsel to look into something in addition to what he was looking into per the prior appointment? And could that extra something be election interference, given the need to toll the report regarding the nature of the appointment until after Nov. 3?
Haven't had a full cup of coffee yet so please let me know if I am making any sense. Below is full text of Section 600.9.
§ 600.9 - Notification and reports by the Attorney General.
(a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action -
(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;
(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and
(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.
(b) The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided.
(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law.
That's been pretty obvious since November when Q offers "Durham" as the solution to the election theft. Also, on December 23rd, Trump tweeted:
“After seeing the massive Voter Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election, I disagree with anyone that thinks a strong, fast, and fair Special Counsel is not needed, IMMEDIATELY. This was the most corrupt election in the history of our Country, and it must be closely examined!”
This is the exact same day Barr stepped down and was replaced by an acting AG who had written research papers into foreign interference in our elections. This guy was now in charge of special counsel investigations until the traitor Garland was confirmed in February.
Thanks for the comment I agree. Devolution guy also points out that Trump tweet was one day after he traveled with Radcliffe who was then DNI, to army navy game. Radcliffe disagreed with the no interference finding
I THINK THIS IS TELLING US DURHAM IS ALSO LOOKING INTO ELECTION INTERFERENCE.
Otherwise, this letter makes no sense.
He says he is tolling the notification provisions in 28 CFR Chapter VI, of 600.9(a)(1), pursuant to the investigative and privacy provisions in 600.9 (b) until "at least after the Nov. 3 election." But 9(a)(1) is a notification "upon appointing a Special Counsel" and the first page of his letter says the Special Counsel was appointed in May, 2019. The letter "tolling" notification is dated October 19, 2020.
So was he saying he was appointing the Special Counsel to look into something in addition to what he was looking into per the prior appointment? And could that extra something be election interference, given the need to toll the report regarding the nature of the appointment until after Nov. 3?
Haven't had a full cup of coffee yet so please let me know if I am making any sense. Below is full text of Section 600.9.
§ 600.9 - Notification and reports by the Attorney General. (a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action -
(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;
(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and
(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.
(b) The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided.
(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law.
The people he has been investigating are a part of a voter fraud cartel so it makes sense!
That's been pretty obvious since November when Q offers "Durham" as the solution to the election theft. Also, on December 23rd, Trump tweeted:
“After seeing the massive Voter Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election, I disagree with anyone that thinks a strong, fast, and fair Special Counsel is not needed, IMMEDIATELY. This was the most corrupt election in the history of our Country, and it must be closely examined!”
This is the exact same day Barr stepped down and was replaced by an acting AG who had written research papers into foreign interference in our elections. This guy was now in charge of special counsel investigations until the traitor Garland was confirmed in February.
Thanks for the comment I agree. Devolution guy also points out that Trump tweet was one day after he traveled with Radcliffe who was then DNI, to army navy game. Radcliffe disagreed with the no interference finding