It's a huge gamble by all parties. They do in fact have Dominion claiming that their machines can not be hooked to the internet. There "appears" to be fairly credible evidence to the contrary.
That all being said, discovery is a bitch. Either they have the goods on Dominion or they don't. Dominion may be forced to turn over software/hardware that to date they have claimed as proprietary property. This could be the biggest trap set for a company ever, it's certainly one of the most public.
but the motion to dismiss would remove the possibility of discovery.
or is the implication here that Dominion sued simply to test them on whether they would try to dismiss and you think they tried to dismiss to make Dominion think they have nothing and to bait Dominion into proceeding with the suit.
It's a huge gamble by all parties. They do in fact have Dominion claiming that their machines can not be hooked to the internet. There "appears" to be fairly credible evidence to the contrary. That all being said, discovery is a bitch. Either they have the goods on Dominion or they don't. Dominion may be forced to turn over software/hardware that to date they have claimed as proprietary property. This could be the biggest trap set for a company ever, it's certainly one of the most public.
but the motion to dismiss would remove the possibility of discovery.
or is the implication here that Dominion sued simply to test them on whether they would try to dismiss and you think they tried to dismiss to make Dominion think they have nothing and to bait Dominion into proceeding with the suit.
Well, Lindell did counter sue so that makes it a bit different, I think.
Interesting thought
Is that you Eric?