SATURDAY: WHO ARE THESE JOKERS? Shills say, "You didn't get your bombshell!" and I see a few patriots feeling shaken, too! OK—QUESTION: What 'bombshell' would bring it all down? Hunter smokes crack. MSM reports NOTHING, just spin. The symposium satisfied 18.10. That's it. 🇺🇸 TRUST THE PLAN 🇺🇸
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
With what? A video proving that he as an adult man has sex with people and does drugs? We know that already.
If anything, that’s likely to garner him support from the liberal movements like MeToo because he’s being blackmailed with weaponized nudes, and that’s become a huge no-no in the last decade.
And if Biden isn’t the President, then you have no reason to care anyway, because blackmailing a nobody accomplishes nothing.
I do care that his third laptop was supposedly stolen and he thinks it's in the hands of Russians. Wanna worry there is something besides porn and drugs on there? But you seem to know more than I do about the contents of his laptop. I wonder why that is?
So what do you think is on that laptop and why?
How would I know? I'm more curious as to why you seem to know there's nothing to blackmail a president with?
I’m not saying that. I’m saying that you’re making an assumption that there is, and I’m not sure what that is based on.
LOL, we have pics Hunter with his underage niece.
We have emails and photos from the laptop proving Biden lied abound not knowing what Hunter was up to.
We have photos from Ukraine of the $6M CASH bribe.
I could go on, but, the incuriousness of the press is not so easily explained away as you think it is. If the roles were reversed, the press would have an absolute field day with it.
This act is wearing thin, mate
I’d be interested in the verification of the woman’s identity as Hunter’s niece, because that part isn’t being reported and if anything was going to cause problems for the Biden family, that would be it.
why do you think it isnt being reported...
I've seen the vid, the girl has a similar hairstyle and thats about it. Tons of girls look like that, nothing particularly identifying. So why are many repeating it as certain fact? Wishful thinking maybe?
If you're going to accuse someone of child abuse, you better have rock solid evidence. If anything, the fact that its freely available and easy to find is an indication it is NOT in fact child porn.
It wasn't a woman. It was clearly a child. And on the laptop was other verifying information, such as the notes from his therapist talking about showers with his underage neice.
I am trying and failing to find those therapist notes that mention this. Of course, it’s kind of a challenging subject to search for safely on the internet, so my research capabilities are a little limited without your help on this one.