No, science has a self-affirming bias, for it builds on itself in perpetuity until it reaches a roadblock, after which we see either a paradigm shift or stagnation. it is biased to any scientific propositions within liberalism and it is biased to scientific propositions within conservatism.

Science is also innately amoral and unethical, as it does not concern itself with abstract and vague matters (Hence why the entire field of sociology is a joke), which is why using science to resolve a moral or ethical quandary is innately fucked