You're right, nobody calls a penis head a "mushroom tip"... Mushroom cloud... FFS
LOL. Either way, to say that someone has good ideas is not to say they are right about everything.
The entire point of his threads is to decode comms, which use symbolism as a means to allow people to read messages into media which normal people wouldn't see.
You know it is undisputed fact that "terrorists" around the world were funded and trained by the CIA, yes?
Do you know anything about terrorist strategy and tactics? Do you know why they act in isolated "cells", which are disconnected from any hierarchical command structure and each other? Why they don't generally know the identities of other terrorists they share alignment and goals with?
It's called compartmentalization. If one cell goes down, they can't identify anyone else and so the operation hasn't been crippled, even if compromised.
And so if you have cells of terrorists around the globe working toward certain goals, but you don't want traceable communications between those cells and the command structure, so they can't lead anyone back to the people in charge, how do you communicate with them?
This is pretty basic psychological and informational warfare stuff. If you don't believe this is how comms work, then I genuinely have no idea why you are on a Q page. We literally read comms into these cryptic posts put forth by some nameless, faceless identity on 8chan. It's kinda "what we do".
This guy turned the tactic on the other side. He is trying to figure out how to decipher the comms of the Deep State. Maybe he's right. Maybe he's wrong.
But he's thinking outside the box. He's practicing skepticism toward mainstream narrative structures. Which once again, is kinda what we DO, here.
So, if it isn't your cup of tea, if you don't find it valuable, don't read it. But I've been reading his shit for almost a year now, and I think he is on to something. I don't think he is right about everything, of course. But he is right about a lot. Future proves past, and he lays it out very clearly in his decodes, AT LEAST as well as anyone is able to do with the Q drops.
Ok but the Hiroshima Myth still says we used nukes, I didnt read the other two.
Sorry, I linked the wrong article. Apparently Zerohedge (or someone else) memory-holed the other article.
Atom Bomb
And here is the much more pertinent article from SymbolsAnon, which also was buried in my search results.
Nuclear Comms Decoded
Didnt read it all but the symbol anon has no clue what hes talking about. Calling the blast from the nuke penis shaped lol
You're right, nobody calls a penis head a "mushroom tip"... Mushroom cloud... FFS
LOL. Either way, to say that someone has good ideas is not to say they are right about everything.
The entire point of his threads is to decode comms, which use symbolism as a means to allow people to read messages into media which normal people wouldn't see.
You know it is undisputed fact that "terrorists" around the world were funded and trained by the CIA, yes?
Do you know anything about terrorist strategy and tactics? Do you know why they act in isolated "cells", which are disconnected from any hierarchical command structure and each other? Why they don't generally know the identities of other terrorists they share alignment and goals with?
It's called compartmentalization. If one cell goes down, they can't identify anyone else and so the operation hasn't been crippled, even if compromised.
And so if you have cells of terrorists around the globe working toward certain goals, but you don't want traceable communications between those cells and the command structure, so they can't lead anyone back to the people in charge, how do you communicate with them?
This is pretty basic psychological and informational warfare stuff. If you don't believe this is how comms work, then I genuinely have no idea why you are on a Q page. We literally read comms into these cryptic posts put forth by some nameless, faceless identity on 8chan. It's kinda "what we do".
This guy turned the tactic on the other side. He is trying to figure out how to decipher the comms of the Deep State. Maybe he's right. Maybe he's wrong.
But he's thinking outside the box. He's practicing skepticism toward mainstream narrative structures. Which once again, is kinda what we DO, here.
So, if it isn't your cup of tea, if you don't find it valuable, don't read it. But I've been reading his shit for almost a year now, and I think he is on to something. I don't think he is right about everything, of course. But he is right about a lot. Future proves past, and he lays it out very clearly in his decodes, AT LEAST as well as anyone is able to do with the Q drops.
Maybe he is right about some stuff I was just talking about nukes though