So looking at the data in this tweet, look how many “deaths” would be attributed to an “unvaccinated person” under that definition.
Similarly data for “cases” would be heavily skewed to “unvaccinated”.
Also, I am seeing a lot of trashing VAERS and I think one can simply respond on that point to say it is the system created by CDC (and its counterparts) for the very purpose of monitoring side effects from vaccines (even though this is not a vaccine they say it is). This is the only system there is for receiving this data and interestingly enough the CDC commissioned a study, which found that the adverse events are under reported on VAERS by a significant factor (i think 10% but would fact check that).
To be fair I used quotes because it is their definition but i did say “vaxxed” and I agree with you!! I try hard to not use vaccine or related words for all the reasons you say!
I am also against trying to get exemptions for these mandates as that gives too much credence to them.
Prophylactic therapeutic at best. Maybe preventive medicine since it allegedly alleviates symptoms. But agreed, vaccine it most certainly isn’t. In the same way as the Drosten PCR test, as I understand it, used a computer model to design the Covid test framework instead of organic viral material, the vaccine is similarly not informed by an isolate.
Covid is an especially clever and ironic virus. What the virus does is keep an eye out for people who just got their second injection. Before the 14 day post 2nd shot period is over, while they are considered unprotected, the Covid virus strikes and kills them, laughing “Ha Ha Ha, you should’ve gotten your shot 14 days earlier, I got you.”
Of course we know that there’s no possibility that these experimental vaccines caused some type of Covid breakthrough infection or mutation. We also know that there’s no way people could suffer any harm from these vaccines despite the fact that they are experimental.
We know these things because some people on TV told us these things. The things that people tell us on TV are always true because those people on TV love us and they would never lie to us.
Pssssssss. It is NOT a vaccine. Mirriam's dictionary or wikipedia are not legal sources. The legal medical definition does NOT in anyway fit the definition of a vaccine. It is in fact, a gene therapy.
So looking at the data in this tweet, look how many “deaths” would be attributed to an “unvaccinated person” under that definition.
Similarly data for “cases” would be heavily skewed to “unvaccinated”.
Also, I am seeing a lot of trashing VAERS and I think one can simply respond on that point to say it is the system created by CDC (and its counterparts) for the very purpose of monitoring side effects from vaccines (even though this is not a vaccine they say it is). This is the only system there is for receiving this data and interestingly enough the CDC commissioned a study, which found that the adverse events are under reported on VAERS by a significant factor (i think 10% but would fact check that).
As I recall, the VAERS database receives fewer than 10% of reported adverse reactions (including death). Could even be fewer than 1%.
To be fair I used quotes because it is their definition but i did say “vaxxed” and I agree with you!! I try hard to not use vaccine or related words for all the reasons you say!
I am also against trying to get exemptions for these mandates as that gives too much credence to them.
Inoculation
Prophylactic therapeutic at best. Maybe preventive medicine since it allegedly alleviates symptoms. But agreed, vaccine it most certainly isn’t. In the same way as the Drosten PCR test, as I understand it, used a computer model to design the Covid test framework instead of organic viral material, the vaccine is similarly not informed by an isolate.
Oh? Please define "climate change" and explain how to measure it?
This would explain the youthful unvaxxed "sudden" covid deaths as clot shot deaths prior to being classified as "vaccinated." Good call OP.
Covid is an especially clever and ironic virus. What the virus does is keep an eye out for people who just got their second injection. Before the 14 day post 2nd shot period is over, while they are considered unprotected, the Covid virus strikes and kills them, laughing “Ha Ha Ha, you should’ve gotten your shot 14 days earlier, I got you.”
Of course we know that there’s no possibility that these experimental vaccines caused some type of Covid breakthrough infection or mutation. We also know that there’s no way people could suffer any harm from these vaccines despite the fact that they are experimental.
We know these things because some people on TV told us these things. The things that people tell us on TV are always true because those people on TV love us and they would never lie to us.
Pssssssss. It is NOT a vaccine. Mirriam's dictionary or wikipedia are not legal sources. The legal medical definition does NOT in anyway fit the definition of a vaccine. It is in fact, a gene therapy.