Tweet from Mike Flynn’s brother
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (91)
sorted by:
98.8 survival with out an experimental rmna gene therapy concoction that the lab animals all died.
Survival rates are based on those who’ve tested positive. If we are to believe there are tons of asymptomatic people running around, the survival rate is much higher.
A positive test means nothing. What is the survival rate when you consider that the tests are all BS and the virus itself has never been proven to exist?
agreed, but you work with the data you have, not the data you don't, lol.
they create the data they want by using PCR testing and ramping up or down the amplifications depending on who they (vax vs unvax, etc) are testing and what they are trying to 'prove'.
Then they're doing a shit job of it, lol
the covid numbers on the CDC website are underwelming to put it mildly...
Also agreed, however, no one cares to look at overall nuances about the data you have and don’t have. Plus, there should be statistical models to tease out estimations.
99.7
99.997 for people under 65
Probably much higher if various proven treatments are administered.