No matter how much we try to set the record straight, these posts keep coming...
It is fully FDA approved. The EUA is for children 12-15 and as a third shot as a booster.
It doesn't matter what their procedures are, because they didn't follow them. They didn't complete the clinical trials. They didn't hold public comment sessions. They didn't even send it in for review of adverse effects.
You can point all this out all you want; they don't care. They approved it anyway.
Would it be safe to say the ink is not yet dry? From the letter Pfizer is required to submit study results analyzing risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, and risk to long-term infant development in pregnant women. Study results to be be submitted to the FDA for review on Oct 31, 2025 and May 31, 2027 respectively. The letter:
https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
The FDA ONLY APPROVED of the APPLICATION for BLA....it's NOT "approved"......like when you "APPLY FOR COLLEGE"...it's NOT THE SAME as when YOU'VE GOTTEN THE ACCEPTANCE LETTER from a college...make sense?????
I think you meant to reply to u/mastaxn as I too am challenging the notion it is fully approved due to what is said in the letter I provided (as per your college letter analogy) about conditional reporting required. I’m wondering if all this obfuscation will help or hinder law suits because they definitely need to go ahead.
No matter how much we try to set the record straight, these posts keep coming...
It is fully FDA approved. The EUA is for children 12-15 and as a third shot as a booster.
It doesn't matter what their procedures are, because they didn't follow them. They didn't complete the clinical trials. They didn't hold public comment sessions. They didn't even send it in for review of adverse effects.
You can point all this out all you want; they don't care. They approved it anyway.
Would it be safe to say the ink is not yet dry? From the letter Pfizer is required to submit study results analyzing risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, and risk to long-term infant development in pregnant women. Study results to be be submitted to the FDA for review on Oct 31, 2025 and May 31, 2027 respectively. The letter: https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
The FDA ONLY APPROVED of the APPLICATION for BLA....it's NOT "approved"......like when you "APPLY FOR COLLEGE"...it's NOT THE SAME as when YOU'VE GOTTEN THE ACCEPTANCE LETTER from a college...make sense?????
I think you meant to reply to u/mastaxn as I too am challenging the notion it is fully approved due to what is said in the letter I provided (as per your college letter analogy) about conditional reporting required. I’m wondering if all this obfuscation will help or hinder law suits because they definitely need to go ahead.
**What is the ACTUAL License # **of COVID-19 “jab” and/or “booster” that was applied for in the Aug. 23,, 2021 FDA Pfizer letter regarding Biologics License Application (BLA)? NO LOCENSE # MEANS NO FULL APPROVAL…JUST AN APPROVAL OF FORM SUBMITTED…see link for AGENCY APPROVAL PROCESS #fakeFDAapproval … #fakeapproval … #fdacorrupt … #trumpwon2020 https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approval-process-cber/biologics-license-applications-bla-process-cber
What is the ACTUAL License # of COVID-19 “jab” and/or “booster” that was applied for in the Aug. 23,, 2021 FDA Pfizer letter regarding Biologics License Application (BLA)? NO LOCENSE # MEANS NO FULL APPROVAL…JUST AN APPROVAL OF FORM SUBMITTED…see link for AGENCY APPROVAL PROCESS #fakeFDAapproval … #fakeapproval … #fdacorrupt … #trumpwon2020 https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approval-process-cber/biologics-license-applications-bla-process-cber
The license number is 2229.