1 in 500 get vax damage. (Based on numbers I see thrown around here). I am a retard, but I am pretty sure that is better than 99% chance of being fine.
Bro I am not arguing, to get the shot, please don’t misunderstand.
I just get weary when I see us saying “all vaxed are dead in three years” … it wouldn’t surprise me, but I’ll believe it when I see it.
I’m to the point where I’m not sure anything I learned in a book or school is even real. So no, I don’t really believe stats, but I thought the 1 in 500 number came from us.
also, why would I get ANYTHING cooked up by these cunts if the “disease” has a 99.8% survive rate ??
I get it. You are using critical thinking skills with a healthy dose of skepticism. It’s the reason you didn’t take the clot shot to begin with. To the flamers you are the same as the vaccine Karen’s on Facebook if you judge someone for questioning
I agree that we mustn't fall in to the same trap as our enemies: exaggerating our claims. I think the death count from the jab is probably 40k in Europe and US. That's still 40k too many. However, it doesn't mean that the blurb from our side about black death type die offs is any more true than the lies from the pro-jabbers. We shouldn't believe any narrative. I ain't taking the jab not because i necessarily believe the apocalyptic scenarios about what it will do, but because I hate being bullied and I hate being used as a lab rate for a new treatment for a virus that kills so few.
What is the real number then, fren ? How many people do you know have vax damage ?? Personally I know none, and I guess that is good cause my friends and family are ok(for now), but that makes the narrative here somewhat like the MSM, just on our side.
I know 2 20 year olds hospitalized with blood clots post vax.
There is zero data what these gene therapy treatments do long term, and they are refusing to classify many of the clot issues as vaccine related.
Subjecting your entire force to what is an experiment with no long term data is a hostile action. Sure, they could all be fine. But who knows? It’s a coin toss, and anyone who says otherwise is lying.
Why risk the unknown and possible decimation of your force for a virus with 99.997 survival rate? It doesn’t make any fucking sense.
I know of a supervisor at work that got the "vaccine" after I told him some of the warnings of scientists and doctors and to just do a bit of research. I actually told him he was a fucking moron if he went ahead and got the jab. Well, after about a month after the shots, he is now having trouble getting full breaths of air and regrets getting the shots. I hope he does not further decline but time will tell.
People are retarded as fuck for trusting "authorities".
Thank God your family is ok still. I sincerely hope they will stay that way during the upcoming cold and flu season. As to your question, I personally know at least 4 people who have had extreme negative effects. 1 of them is dead. I won't give a "best guess" percentage because as of right now no one knows. All of the hospitals, nursing homes and reporting systems are either hiding the real numbers and or can't keep up with the data. I've heard that at least 500,000 people have perished already from the shot. If those numbers are true, I think it is safe to say tens of millions of people are injured from these bioweapons. Are you aware of what is in these shots? Graphene oxide is one of the main ingredients which is highly toxic to humans. I've spent 100s of hours easily watching, listening and reading about these so call vaccines and the horrible effects it has on people. If you want, I can compile a short list of good information sources to get you started on the right track.
I would like to know how you got that percentage 99% of vaxxed are fine.
1 in 500 get vax damage. (Based on numbers I see thrown around here). I am a retard, but I am pretty sure that is better than 99% chance of being fine.
I remember when the first studies suggested a 1:100,000 chance of young adult males getting myocarditis from the shot.
Shortly afterward, those numbers increased to 1:20,000. This was April.
That’s an 80% jump.
You do realize most statistics are purposefully withheld because of vaccine hesitancy being perceived as a threat, do you not?
Bro I am not arguing, to get the shot, please don’t misunderstand.
I just get weary when I see us saying “all vaxed are dead in three years” … it wouldn’t surprise me, but I’ll believe it when I see it.
I’m to the point where I’m not sure anything I learned in a book or school is even real. So no, I don’t really believe stats, but I thought the 1 in 500 number came from us.
also, why would I get ANYTHING cooked up by these cunts if the “disease” has a 99.8% survive rate ??
I get it. You are using critical thinking skills with a healthy dose of skepticism. It’s the reason you didn’t take the clot shot to begin with. To the flamers you are the same as the vaccine Karen’s on Facebook if you judge someone for questioning
I agree that we mustn't fall in to the same trap as our enemies: exaggerating our claims. I think the death count from the jab is probably 40k in Europe and US. That's still 40k too many. However, it doesn't mean that the blurb from our side about black death type die offs is any more true than the lies from the pro-jabbers. We shouldn't believe any narrative. I ain't taking the jab not because i necessarily believe the apocalyptic scenarios about what it will do, but because I hate being bullied and I hate being used as a lab rate for a new treatment for a virus that kills so few.
I agree with your diagnosis of yourself as being retarded.
What is the real number then, fren ? How many people do you know have vax damage ?? Personally I know none, and I guess that is good cause my friends and family are ok(for now), but that makes the narrative here somewhat like the MSM, just on our side.
I know 2 20 year olds hospitalized with blood clots post vax.
There is zero data what these gene therapy treatments do long term, and they are refusing to classify many of the clot issues as vaccine related.
Subjecting your entire force to what is an experiment with no long term data is a hostile action. Sure, they could all be fine. But who knows? It’s a coin toss, and anyone who says otherwise is lying.
Why risk the unknown and possible decimation of your force for a virus with 99.997 survival rate? It doesn’t make any fucking sense.
I know of a supervisor at work that got the "vaccine" after I told him some of the warnings of scientists and doctors and to just do a bit of research. I actually told him he was a fucking moron if he went ahead and got the jab. Well, after about a month after the shots, he is now having trouble getting full breaths of air and regrets getting the shots. I hope he does not further decline but time will tell.
People are retarded as fuck for trusting "authorities".
Thank God your family is ok still. I sincerely hope they will stay that way during the upcoming cold and flu season. As to your question, I personally know at least 4 people who have had extreme negative effects. 1 of them is dead. I won't give a "best guess" percentage because as of right now no one knows. All of the hospitals, nursing homes and reporting systems are either hiding the real numbers and or can't keep up with the data. I've heard that at least 500,000 people have perished already from the shot. If those numbers are true, I think it is safe to say tens of millions of people are injured from these bioweapons. Are you aware of what is in these shots? Graphene oxide is one of the main ingredients which is highly toxic to humans. I've spent 100s of hours easily watching, listening and reading about these so call vaccines and the horrible effects it has on people. If you want, I can compile a short list of good information sources to get you started on the right track.