control F will allow you to search the courts opinion. All this noise and not one person can show where it says anything about recalling electors, because it doesn't. I tried to lead you all to this the first time this clickbait was posted and no one bothered to read for themselves.
After reading through some of the courts opinion, I think it would come down to what they actually mean by the term discretion. It doesn't expressly say recalling electors can be done. They do say that nothing in the Constitution prohibits states from taking away electors voting discretion. That sounds like nothing in the Constitution forces states how to act with respect to their electors. Meaning states have final authority on how to handle electors. I suppose that could be interpreted as states being allowed to recall electors, but I suspect if or when something like that happens it will be cause for another SCOTUS case to argue those points. I don't think they ever have been.
On the other hand, if it even got to that point then fraud should/will have been proven and the election is null and void anyways. At the least for that particular state.
control F will allow you to search the courts opinion. All this noise and not one person can show where it says anything about recalling electors, because it doesn't. I tried to lead you all to this the first time this clickbait was posted and no one bothered to read for themselves.
After reading through some of the courts opinion, I think it would come down to what they actually mean by the term discretion. It doesn't expressly say recalling electors can be done. They do say that nothing in the Constitution prohibits states from taking away electors voting discretion. That sounds like nothing in the Constitution forces states how to act with respect to their electors. Meaning states have final authority on how to handle electors. I suppose that could be interpreted as states being allowed to recall electors, but I suspect if or when something like that happens it will be cause for another SCOTUS case to argue those points. I don't think they ever have been.
On the other hand, if it even got to that point then fraud should/will have been proven and the election is null and void anyways. At the least for that particular state.
Just my $0.02