Expected vs Observed myopericarditis after dose 2 mRNA vaxx
(i.imgflip.com)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Do you have CDC source? Would like to see it.
Edit: Found it https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-08-30/03-COVID-Su-508.pdf?ftag=MSF0951a18
So the "safe" vaccine was expected to cause heart problems?
Doesn't sound very safe. Why didn't they disclose that to the public?
I think the "expected" number is likely from historical data without the injections (i.e., what would have happened naturally).
Depends on how they define “Expected”. Based on the FDA slides from October 2020 myocarditis is an “expected” side effect.
Edit: went looking. Based on the way they adjusted the female numbers and account for those, I’m guessing your right. It’s likely the expected ‘background‘ rates. “expected estimates for females 12–29 years adjusted to reflect reduced incidence in this age group”
Yes, their "predictive" models have proven time and again to be complete crap. Why would they expose themselves more by breaking out male and female classifications and doubling their chance of being wrong?
“Oh but didn’t you see the ‘per million doses slide’, we were wrong but the number is so small it doesn’t really matter.... look a squirrel”
CDC admits to somewhere around 50x higher chance of the disease after the shot for young males.
And that’s just within seven days...
CDC https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/cdc-hold-emergency-meeting-after-100s-suffer-heart-inflammation-following-covid-vaccines “Of note, of these 528 reports after second dose with symptom onset within 30 days, over half of them were in these younger age groups, 12–24 years old, whereas roughly 9 percent of total doses administered were in those age groups, so we “clearly have an imbalance there,” he added later.” “Data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which comes from nine healthcare groups that have collectively administered over 8.8 million doses—only some 284,000 of those have been given to 12- to 17-year-olds—did not indicate safety concerns, with just 60 myocarditis or pericarditis events reported through May 29” That’s a 1 in 4733 change of getting myocarditis for such young ones not at risk of covid at all. And that’s if we believe the reported numbers. Assuming the 1% under-reported aspect the odds shift to 1 in 47
But they say it’s okay cause a few less people die than might... Predicted cases prevented vs myocarditis: https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJBvdPAf/so-let-me-get-this-straight-for-/c/
Predicted cases Vs myocarditis. Rush reward analysts by CDC “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in adolescents and young adults: Benefit-risk discussion”https://files.catbox.moe/6yiym5.pdf Pg 32
June 18 2021: End result of myocarditis is a heart transplant https://odysee.com/@CosmicEvent:5/UNVAXED-STILL-AT-RISK-OF-SPIKE-PROTEIN!:b?fbclid=IwAR3pCSDCGHX0sk8qy05pB9wLhxGHOemSTwAhL1w76SGr6NuFXNoe6hnsuzw
This seems huge. No men under 50 should be going near this thing.
The actual numbers are way higher. There's hundreds if not thousands of people complaining about heart pain on r/covidvaccinated alone. So much goes unreported. Even "minor" heart pain can mean years of life lost.
Source :
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/slides-2021-08-30.html
Safety update for COVID-19 vaccines: VAERS
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-08-30/03-COVID-Su-508.pdf page 7
Thanks for the link!
Here is another image link of the OP’s great post for sharing. Clearer capture, possibly larger file. https://files.catbox.moe/xu3q0j.jpeg
I don’t think they can make that conclusion... they are taking surveys and basically keeping an eye out until November... very reasurring.
Direct link to this on their site?
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-08-30/03-COVID-Su-508.pdf?ftag=MSF0951a18
theyre killing the men
Military aged men, at that.
And what race in America is mostly getting the Vaxx? They're killing white men