Not this American, I believe it to be true. Many many more people will die from the jab. It's happening before our eyes. We were told early in the jabbing that it would kill those who took when they came into contact with a simple cold virus as the immune system would be overstimulated and attack itself. I believe we are seeing that with all of these new "covid" cases. I am seeing cases and reading about them on VAERS. It seems if you have any cancer in your body either dormant or active it speeds up the activity greatly. It finds your weakness and exploits that. That's what this nanotechnology is doing.
The lymphatic response we see in the vaccinated over the next 6 months will show us more of what is coming.
When their AK Cells and T-Cells in their Lymphatic Response only respond to known variants ( if that is even true ) we don’t know what will happen moving forward.
Influenza Vaccine has only ever been 23% - 38% effective because it artificially trains the immune system to respond to a specific strain that is guessed. If they guess wrong this means what gains you would have had from the vaccine turn into immediate losses as in simple terms your immune response jigs left, the different flu strain jigs right, and then runs for a touchdown - thus that vaccine actually made shit far worse for you than it would have been.
Now a Flu vaccine also does not use mRNA. What we don’t know here is how the spike proteins made by the immune system because of the mRNA are going to accumulate over time. It could be anything like IG Reponse we see in people with severe allergic reactions where anything suddenly collapses their systems ( think of how peanuts now hurt so many ) to a slow organ failure and growth of complex unknown morbidity ( random death complicated an autopsy can’t determine ).
Look “Trust the Science” should immediately negate any conversation . Science is never to be trusted. It’s about observations. Nothing is conclusive and the number of times science is redefined is insane.
Look at what I mentioned with Severe Allergy proliferation. This was first posed in 1991 as being caused by Toxicity Response - that your immune system somehow learned to associate say peanuts with a number of poisonous proteins it could have come into contact with when you ate tainted peanuts in the past. Science has refused to persue this for over 20 years when the premise could generate a goldmine. Why? Research grants and funding were denied.
I just said that Mainstream Science as an industry has refused to bankroll and explore severe allergic reaction. Why? They want to sell Epinephrine for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$
There is an entire book written on the link between peanut allergies and vaccines.
The basic premise is:
Your body will not react to a dead virus because it is dead.
Vaccines containing dead viruses need an adjuvant to work.
An adjuvant is a substance that irritates the immune system, provoking your immune system to attack. Generally aluminum or thimerosal (mercury).
In theory, this is great, and your immune system will attack the dead virus.
In practice, vaccines contain hundreds of other ingredients, including eggs, animal tissue, contaminants, and human fetal tissue.
Since an adjuvant simply trains your body to attack, it is possible your body will attack some of the other ingredients including human tissue. The explosion of autoimmune diseases is correlated with vaccines in multiple ways.
There is evidence that peanut oil was used as a stabilizer in vaccines in the 90’s. If there was any peanut protein contaminating these vaccines, that explains the explosion of peanut allergies.
Since these allergies occurred among many children, all from different backgrounds, genetics does not explain it.
So in our home what we have been doing is the following with our kids:
We eat clean as we can. If you need a machine to make it we don't eat it. Lots of farm to table.
COSEVA TRS - Passive Chelation Therapy. I can't argue with the results. My eye color has changed and a number of long-term health issues have subsided. My autistic daughter has rapidly seen an abatement of much of her complexities. For Instance she has gained %80 more language, stimms less, is far happier, and sleeps much better. She also fights off sickness remarkably well and has a better tolerance for food ( eating is a hard aspect of her Spectrum ).
Cleaner Water
No vaccinations
We expose them to sick people and plan around it. They get sick. We encourage it.
Now here we are and there have been many flu ( even covid ) that has gone through my extended circle and we fared far better than everyone else. it's pretty wild to see.
In a certain sense science is the only thing to be trusted.
We just have to carefully define science as the actual science, a/k/a factual empirical knowledge, not some sick fuck's twisted presentation of it that hides the truth and pushes a globohomo agenda.
My statement is over the term "science" itself as it has grown into a language device that is so abstracted the phrase itself, in common conversational consequence, is largely useless.
science
[ sahy-uhns ]SHOW IPA
See synonyms for science on Thesaurus.com
🍎 Elementary Level
noun
- a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws:
- the mathematical sciences.
- systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through
- observation and experimentation.
any of the branches of natural orphysical science.
- systematized knowledge in general.
- knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
- a particular branch of knowledge.
It's being used in ways that are so contextual that I do not trust the phrase when it's being used for a number of reasons.
That said, philosophically, science is only as established as it's frame of reference and social understanding of much of it. Take Medicine itself. To many - unless the science is defined by an authoritative body - it's faulty / bad / incorrect / doesn't even exist. That "Science" is subjective to the specific paradigm - which to someone ( say a normie looking for vaccine info ) is going to not have any reference to and gets "Science" that is politically sculpted by a medical community.
Recent studies are showing that %15 - %20 of researchers say that their grantees force them to both change results and omit results. Think about that. That's an admission that a private grant may intentionally skew %20 of published science.
The same research has been showing that the number of intentional skew goes up substantially more when a government is the grant provider. The rates there were %23 - %31 on average.
I don't trust science. I can't. Trust is naive. Hell if I trusted Science I could have waited for the results of the NIST report on WTC7 ) which is laughably silly.
That is a USA perspective- 100% can be killed and still have plenty of humans left in China and elsewhere as servants. The plot is global.
Not this American, I believe it to be true. Many many more people will die from the jab. It's happening before our eyes. We were told early in the jabbing that it would kill those who took when they came into contact with a simple cold virus as the immune system would be overstimulated and attack itself. I believe we are seeing that with all of these new "covid" cases. I am seeing cases and reading about them on VAERS. It seems if you have any cancer in your body either dormant or active it speeds up the activity greatly. It finds your weakness and exploits that. That's what this nanotechnology is doing.
The lymphatic response we see in the vaccinated over the next 6 months will show us more of what is coming.
When their AK Cells and T-Cells in their Lymphatic Response only respond to known variants ( if that is even true ) we don’t know what will happen moving forward.
Influenza Vaccine has only ever been 23% - 38% effective because it artificially trains the immune system to respond to a specific strain that is guessed. If they guess wrong this means what gains you would have had from the vaccine turn into immediate losses as in simple terms your immune response jigs left, the different flu strain jigs right, and then runs for a touchdown - thus that vaccine actually made shit far worse for you than it would have been.
Now a Flu vaccine also does not use mRNA. What we don’t know here is how the spike proteins made by the immune system because of the mRNA are going to accumulate over time. It could be anything like IG Reponse we see in people with severe allergic reactions where anything suddenly collapses their systems ( think of how peanuts now hurt so many ) to a slow organ failure and growth of complex unknown morbidity ( random death complicated an autopsy can’t determine ).
Look “Trust the Science” should immediately negate any conversation . Science is never to be trusted. It’s about observations. Nothing is conclusive and the number of times science is redefined is insane.
Look at what I mentioned with Severe Allergy proliferation. This was first posed in 1991 as being caused by Toxicity Response - that your immune system somehow learned to associate say peanuts with a number of poisonous proteins it could have come into contact with when you ate tainted peanuts in the past. Science has refused to persue this for over 20 years when the premise could generate a goldmine. Why? Research grants and funding were denied.
I just said that Mainstream Science as an industry has refused to bankroll and explore severe allergic reaction. Why? They want to sell Epinephrine for $$$$$$$$$$$$$$
There is an entire book written on the link between peanut allergies and vaccines.
The basic premise is:
Your body will not react to a dead virus because it is dead.
Vaccines containing dead viruses need an adjuvant to work.
An adjuvant is a substance that irritates the immune system, provoking your immune system to attack. Generally aluminum or thimerosal (mercury).
In theory, this is great, and your immune system will attack the dead virus.
In practice, vaccines contain hundreds of other ingredients, including eggs, animal tissue, contaminants, and human fetal tissue.
Since an adjuvant simply trains your body to attack, it is possible your body will attack some of the other ingredients including human tissue. The explosion of autoimmune diseases is correlated with vaccines in multiple ways.
There is evidence that peanut oil was used as a stabilizer in vaccines in the 90’s. If there was any peanut protein contaminating these vaccines, that explains the explosion of peanut allergies.
Since these allergies occurred among many children, all from different backgrounds, genetics does not explain it.
Brilliant comment & Very Much Appreciated.
So in our home what we have been doing is the following with our kids:
Now here we are and there have been many flu ( even covid ) that has gone through my extended circle and we fared far better than everyone else. it's pretty wild to see.
In a certain sense science is the only thing to be trusted.
We just have to carefully define science as the actual science, a/k/a factual empirical knowledge, not some sick fuck's twisted presentation of it that hides the truth and pushes a globohomo agenda.
My statement is over the term "science" itself as it has grown into a language device that is so abstracted the phrase itself, in common conversational consequence, is largely useless.
It's being used in ways that are so contextual that I do not trust the phrase when it's being used for a number of reasons.
That said, philosophically, science is only as established as it's frame of reference and social understanding of much of it. Take Medicine itself. To many - unless the science is defined by an authoritative body - it's faulty / bad / incorrect / doesn't even exist. That "Science" is subjective to the specific paradigm - which to someone ( say a normie looking for vaccine info ) is going to not have any reference to and gets "Science" that is politically sculpted by a medical community.
Recent studies are showing that %15 - %20 of researchers say that their grantees force them to both change results and omit results. Think about that. That's an admission that a private grant may intentionally skew %20 of published science.
The same research has been showing that the number of intentional skew goes up substantially more when a government is the grant provider. The rates there were %23 - %31 on average.
I don't trust science. I can't. Trust is naive. Hell if I trusted Science I could have waited for the results of the NIST report on WTC7 ) which is laughably silly.
I believe what you are referring to is called "ADE" - Antibody Dependent Enhancement.
It is very well documented and I believe was a very common if not universal outcome of prior coronavirus vaccine development / testing / trials.