π¨ Smoking Gun: CDC Stealthily Admits The PCR Tests Were Fraudulent π¨
(blog.nomorefakenews.com)
π₯ B O O M ! π₯
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
I have responded to this story multiple times. The recall was not a result of the test being faulty. Itβs in favor of a test that can detect both covid and the flu. The old test could ONLY detect covid, not the flu, but it found covid just fine.
I can write out the whole thing again, but an article came out just a few days ago, so I donβt have to.
https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/pcr-test-recall-can-the-test-tell-the-difference-between-covid-19-and-the-flu
I would encourage you to read it and the reread the recall notice, and see if you still agree that this is a bombshell.
The test was FAULTY from day one. Had to cycle 40 times to find dead cells...couldn't differentiate cv19 from any other virus or bacteria infection... it was never created for CV19 testing per the inventor of this test. That's pretty darn faulty
The tests only detected one thing, the thing that "they" wanted to blame for cause of death. But relying only on such a test would help exclude the possibility of another thing actually contributing to and/or being the direct cause of death. All a way to pump up the numbers.
Thesis: Covid is DeAdLiEsT ViRus EvEr! Evidence A: test detects trace of covid Evidence B: patient dies Attempted correlation: B must have been the result of A Conclusion: therefore, thesis is true
Circular reasoning. Starting with a thesis and then twisting data to support that thesis.
Yep.
Null Hypothesis is supposed to save scientists from nature rolling random dice.
And the covid nightmare fails it everytime.
We already know about bad colds. There's nothing special about 2019 other than the hype.