The tests only detected one thing, the thing that "they" wanted to blame for cause of death. But relying only on such a test would help exclude the possibility of another thing actually contributing to and/or being the direct cause of death. All a way to pump up the numbers.
Thesis: Covid is DeAdLiEsT ViRus EvEr!
Evidence A: test detects trace of covid
Evidence B: patient dies
Attempted correlation: B must have been the result of A
Conclusion: therefore, thesis is true
Circular reasoning. Starting with a thesis and then twisting data to support that thesis.
The tests only detected one thing, the thing that "they" wanted to blame for cause of death. But relying only on such a test would help exclude the possibility of another thing actually contributing to and/or being the direct cause of death. All a way to pump up the numbers.
Thesis: Covid is DeAdLiEsT ViRus EvEr! Evidence A: test detects trace of covid Evidence B: patient dies Attempted correlation: B must have been the result of A Conclusion: therefore, thesis is true
Circular reasoning. Starting with a thesis and then twisting data to support that thesis.
Yep.
Null Hypothesis is supposed to save scientists from nature rolling random dice.
And the covid nightmare fails it everytime.
We already know about bad colds. There's nothing special about 2019 other than the hype.