It takes a few seconds to click a link to realize what it's about. If it doesn't by nature of content, then of course there should probably be some description.
Algorithms can't follow links to pick up on what they are about easily or quickly, especially if it's a video that needs analyzed.
They can if the title is perfectly descriptive though, the process would basically be automatic, instant, and precise.
I understand you. When it's a shitty post, it's shitty regardless of the title though.
I think there's a possibility we should be more wary of though. There's very good logical reason to use click-bait titles when you are trying to have censors pass over you.
In the past, I've posted what I believed to be fantastic content and it was well descriptively titled, but it got shills attention immediately and got buried by downvotes and passed over by all the casual people who just look at the hot tab.
I've noticed that shitty titles pass by the censors for long enough for people to pick up on the good content and lift it to exposure before shills can bury it.
I find it to be a healthy level of paranoia. Distrust of electronics and the crazy shit people can code is not absurd. We KNOW they are watching us, ffs.
It is not sudden because a lot of people are requesting front line doctor information and links for lawyers fighting vax mandates that have hit all over the US the last few weeks.
The search function isn't the best which is why more descriptive titles are requested to make it easier for people looking for resources to fight vax mandates.
It is funny to imagine the kind of person that actually stalks you through threads to attack your character and downvotes your comments like it means anything at all. It's the best thing ever to read other's projections onto me as I literally can't help but smile. These people have no clue what it means to be free.
Post/comment voting encourages behavior that isn't friendly to us autists, let alone encourages shills. It's a shame that normies need it to feel "cozy" since they need to be hand held and guided to what to believe.
Q posted to a site that didn't moderate or vote on content for a reason.
It's to be expected at Reddit styled sites, but you can also learn quite a bit from the voting patterns. That is something special that you don't get at the chans. The policing is just an unfortunate side effect that well intended normies fall into.
Well it's helpful when you are lookin through hundreds of posts for a specific topic
OP is trolling.
Everybody honest understands the purpose of using informative titles.
He's not looking for reasons; he's just a faggot looking for a fight.
Where you can't argue in reason, argue against the character. That's how a fool will always argue.
I called you a faggot cause you think being downvoted is a "mess".
It takes a few seconds to click a link to realize what it's about. If it doesn't by nature of content, then of course there should probably be some description.
Algorithms can't follow links to pick up on what they are about easily or quickly, especially if it's a video that needs analyzed.
They can if the title is perfectly descriptive though, the process would basically be automatic, instant, and precise.
I'm just tired of posts with click-baity titles.
I understand you. When it's a shitty post, it's shitty regardless of the title though.
I think there's a possibility we should be more wary of though. There's very good logical reason to use click-bait titles when you are trying to have censors pass over you.
In the past, I've posted what I believed to be fantastic content and it was well descriptively titled, but it got shills attention immediately and got buried by downvotes and passed over by all the casual people who just look at the hot tab.
I've noticed that shitty titles pass by the censors for long enough for people to pick up on the good content and lift it to exposure before shills can bury it.
OFFS, you absolute clown.
Triggered case in point right here.
I find it to be a healthy level of paranoia. Distrust of electronics and the crazy shit people can code is not absurd. We KNOW they are watching us, ffs.
It is not sudden because a lot of people are requesting front line doctor information and links for lawyers fighting vax mandates that have hit all over the US the last few weeks.
The search function isn't the best which is why more descriptive titles are requested to make it easier for people looking for resources to fight vax mandates.
Sounds like a very specific argument pertaining to legal help. Who's posting titles of legal help that isn't searchable?
This is why Q posts the way he does
It is funny to imagine the kind of person that actually stalks you through threads to attack your character and downvotes your comments like it means anything at all. It's the best thing ever to read other's projections onto me as I literally can't help but smile. These people have no clue what it means to be free.
Why did you post the same shpeel but with italics in #2 and then respond to your own barely different comments? Are you a drunk bot ?
Chill out faggot. Read what he wrote and you'd understand. Know that this is someone who came from /pol/ and is used to posts being anonymized.
Kek. For an autist usernames dont really stick out in your mind do they? Question not, aye?
Post/comment voting encourages behavior that isn't friendly to us autists, let alone encourages shills. It's a shame that normies need it to feel "cozy" since they need to be hand held and guided to what to believe.
Q posted to a site that didn't moderate or vote on content for a reason.
It's to be expected at Reddit styled sites, but you can also learn quite a bit from the voting patterns. That is something special that you don't get at the chans. The policing is just an unfortunate side effect that well intended normies fall into.