even if Q was bull shit. this group is dangerouse in that it indicates they do not have control. I am agnostic about Q but the best place to find view 's that are different on everything going on is from those that up till December 8th were fallowing the Q drops.
How so? This is a q board and while it’s moved away from that we are still learning things. There’s way to much behind the Q thing to just be a larp. Time will definitely tell. Have you read the devolution series? I suggest you should if you haven’t.
fallowed from almost the beginning . read the de evolution series. I take a lot of those into Q seriously becouse they are looking into so many difrent things that are not Q like the de evolution idea. I am agnostic on what's going on with the Q posts becouse all that's going on is that some one is claiming to have inside information. the stuff people call proofs is just the presentation of information that lends its self to giving credibility through not understanding how the proof is done....think stage magic. and that is the reason I dont except a proof as a proof....but I do believe I can easily be wrong on my assessments on what is going on with the proofs.
even if Q was bull shit. this group is dangerouse in that it indicates they do not have control. I am agnostic about Q but the best place to find view 's that are different on everything going on is from those that up till December 8th were fallowing the Q drops.
How so? This is a q board and while it’s moved away from that we are still learning things. There’s way to much behind the Q thing to just be a larp. Time will definitely tell. Have you read the devolution series? I suggest you should if you haven’t.
This.
fallowed from almost the beginning . read the de evolution series. I take a lot of those into Q seriously becouse they are looking into so many difrent things that are not Q like the de evolution idea. I am agnostic on what's going on with the Q posts becouse all that's going on is that some one is claiming to have inside information. the stuff people call proofs is just the presentation of information that lends its self to giving credibility through not understanding how the proof is done....think stage magic. and that is the reason I dont except a proof as a proof....but I do believe I can easily be wrong on my assessments on what is going on with the proofs.
The proof is in the pudding Brah. Too many coincidences to be coincidental. Read Devolution.