Aren't deaths supposed to be verified with proof such as death certificate or things of that nature? At least the deaths component, not sure about other side effects.
This is not something I know enough about to answer directly.
I do know enough to know that people die all the time with an assumed cause of death. And that further questions might cause an investigation.
But when something gets sent to VAERS, all it's saying is that someone died or got sick within some window after getting the vaccine.
That's it. Could be a cough. Could be a fever. Could be death. But anything that can't IMMEDIATELY be ruled as 100% not related to the vaccine? It's a potential VAERS report.
And that's not even considering the fact that anyone, including non-medical people who are evaluating their own symptoms using WebMD, can also file these reports.
"My eye is itchy and dry and I got the vaccine last week."
That's a legitimate report. They file, VAERS uploads the data.
It's not ignoring it. It's understanding that just because the data is made available to laypeople does not mean the data is curated for laypeople to understand. It's open-source for other researchers.
It's simply not designed to collect the data you need to support the conclusions you want it to support.
Aren't deaths supposed to be verified with proof such as death certificate or things of that nature? At least the deaths component, not sure about other side effects.
This is not something I know enough about to answer directly.
I do know enough to know that people die all the time with an assumed cause of death. And that further questions might cause an investigation.
But when something gets sent to VAERS, all it's saying is that someone died or got sick within some window after getting the vaccine.
That's it. Could be a cough. Could be a fever. Could be death. But anything that can't IMMEDIATELY be ruled as 100% not related to the vaccine? It's a potential VAERS report.
And that's not even considering the fact that anyone, including non-medical people who are evaluating their own symptoms using WebMD, can also file these reports.
"My eye is itchy and dry and I got the vaccine last week."
That's a legitimate report. They file, VAERS uploads the data.
lol at wanting to ignore the only government vaccine reporting system because it COULD be false in favor of your own personal hypothesis
It's not ignoring it. It's understanding that just because the data is made available to laypeople does not mean the data is curated for laypeople to understand. It's open-source for other researchers.
It's simply not designed to collect the data you need to support the conclusions you want it to support.
Here's what the VAERS system itself says about this: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
I have two relatives who died from the vaccine and know many others with adverse effects, primarily bleeding complications.