There is no empty lot at the address listed on the canvas report. The fail is on the part of the report.
Having said that, I can't find a spot that looks like the picture could have been taken at that address. There is a long stone wall in the picture. There is no online resource that shows such a wall anywhere on that street.
Yeah everyone here is not reading this right - the REPORT claims it's an empty lot, and it doesn't appear to be. It’s also not a lot located next to a property - mapping software shows the entire area is the same address. This kind of stuff drives me crazy, and makes us all look like idiots.
This is how we roll - early big fail, becomes associated with an entire report, which becomes associated with an entire effort. Democrats don't have this problem of course, they own the media. But when you're fighting propaganda, you can't make mistakes like this. Or you have a communications team get out in front somehow early and often.
Did you even look at the county report you just linked? It says in no uncertain terms that it is an owner occupied property, with a house built in 2005. There is nothing that says anything about anything being empty except the Canvas report which is CLEARLY incorrect.
Like seriously, if you have a point to make, make it, but this type of nonsensical strawman is ludicrous.
The Report said there is no house at that address. There is obviously a house at that address and it is owner occupied. The report fucked up, big time. It is time to move on and deal with reality.
LOL. I'm not sure what their point is. The address has a property, which means there's a property owner, which means the votes are not "ghost" votes as alleged by the report.
A canvas is very informal - anyone can write anything when answering, it's basically a survey. I could have said I voted and then given the address of a blank lot - just to sabotage it. But here it looks like they didn't run down some addresses properly.
Of course it doesn't "debunk" anything. It is just a really bad look, and allows for anyone who wants to discredit it really easy ammo to do so. It is an EPIC failure.
This canvas isn't even close to the best evidence that exists. Its just that it was supposed to support the upcoming audit and this fuck up will have the opposite effect, because it will be associated with it.
I’m not convinced it’s a fuck-up. I don’t claim it is the best evidence, just that it is more evidence to add to the pile of voter fraud evidence that continues to come out every week starting with the cyber symposium.
More evidence is coming, and every time more comes out, it will be attacked by the fake news and their controlled opposition.
That's pretty consistent with just about any fact check I've ever seen.
The "fact checkers" are just cyber sleuths and if they can't find it on the internet or find one site that disagrees, then they call it debunked. In this case, we're supposed to believe a pictures on Google maps proves everything. I don't even think they know how to call people on the phone.
What?
There is no empty lot at the address listed on the canvas report. The fail is on the part of the report.
Having said that, I can't find a spot that looks like the picture could have been taken at that address. There is a long stone wall in the picture. There is no online resource that shows such a wall anywhere on that street.
Yeah everyone here is not reading this right - the REPORT claims it's an empty lot, and it doesn't appear to be. It’s also not a lot located next to a property - mapping software shows the entire area is the same address. This kind of stuff drives me crazy, and makes us all look like idiots.
Confirmation bias is rampant today. No one wants to face the truth of how phenomenally fucked up this is.
Personally, I think its sabotage. I really don't think the picture is of the same property. I think someone snuck a different address on there.
This is how we roll - early big fail, becomes associated with an entire report, which becomes associated with an entire effort. Democrats don't have this problem of course, they own the media. But when you're fighting propaganda, you can't make mistakes like this. Or you have a communications team get out in front somehow early and often.
Perhaps it was sabotage, perhaps not.
Yup. Report is wrong, there's a house there.
I know where the house is. What the fuck?
The report says it is an empty lot at 13226 W. Beverly Rd. Goodyear AZ.
There is no empty lot there.
The Canvas report fucked up.
What the hell is the argument?
What the holy fuck are you talking about?
Did you even look at the county report you just linked? It says in no uncertain terms that it is an owner occupied property, with a house built in 2005. There is nothing that says anything about anything being empty except the Canvas report which is CLEARLY incorrect.
Look on ANY RESOURCE including your link.
Dude...
Like seriously, if you have a point to make, make it, but this type of nonsensical strawman is ludicrous.
The Report said there is no house at that address. There is obviously a house at that address and it is owner occupied. The report fucked up, big time. It is time to move on and deal with reality.
LOL. I'm not sure what their point is. The address has a property, which means there's a property owner, which means the votes are not "ghost" votes as alleged by the report.
A canvas is very informal - anyone can write anything when answering, it's basically a survey. I could have said I voted and then given the address of a blank lot - just to sabotage it. But here it looks like they didn't run down some addresses properly.
Let me get this straight, they go to an empty lot where there is no house.
A Google map shot from over 5 years ago shows a house there and everyone just buys what Google maps says?
I trust Google maps as much as I trust Google.
You did not get anything straight.
Every online resource says there is a house there. Every one. Every house retailer, EVERY map source, county records...
Everything.
Oh ok. So does this deboonk the entire report? Or is this the only address the fact checkers could find a house at?
Of course it doesn't "debunk" anything. It is just a really bad look, and allows for anyone who wants to discredit it really easy ammo to do so. It is an EPIC failure.
This canvas isn't even close to the best evidence that exists. Its just that it was supposed to support the upcoming audit and this fuck up will have the opposite effect, because it will be associated with it.
I guess that’s one way to spin it.
I’ll be spinning it differently, though.
I’m not convinced it’s a fuck-up. I don’t claim it is the best evidence, just that it is more evidence to add to the pile of voter fraud evidence that continues to come out every week starting with the cyber symposium.
More evidence is coming, and every time more comes out, it will be attacked by the fake news and their controlled opposition.
That's pretty consistent with just about any fact check I've ever seen.
The "fact checkers" are just cyber sleuths and if they can't find it on the internet or find one site that disagrees, then they call it debunked. In this case, we're supposed to believe a pictures on Google maps proves everything. I don't even think they know how to call people on the phone.
true