Organized Scientific Fraud: SARS-CoV-2 is an Unrestricted Bioweapon
(www.americaoutloud.com)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
And for what the bioweapon doesn't do, the jabs and the hospitals (Remdesivir and ventilators) are assisting by taking up the slack.
Truth....
That’s a good point, but IF “covid” actually exists, and IF it’s true that it is a bio weapon, then it has to be THE worst bioweapon of all time.
A bio weapon with a 99.97% survivability rate??
The jab is the real bio weapon.
Depend on the objective of said bioweapon. If the goal was to create lockdowns to justify mail in voting, destroy American small business while allowing big business and pharmaceutical companies to post record numbers, and create fear and panic... then I would say it has done exactly what they wanted.
They wouldn’t want something so deadly they themselves would be at major risk. Think logically. Psyops and weak biological weapons are far more effective to produce what they want: a weakened, beaten down society that becomes more reliant on government and big pharma.
[They] don't need an actual, existing, virus to create fear and panic and enforce lockdowns. They can simply hijack the Flu and Cold and then inflate the numbers and lie lie lie to achieve this. See my comment below regarding this point.
Think Wag the Dog.
The article tags it as a bioweapon because it was obviously constructed by man, which means there was an intent to do something with it. Maybe they planned to play with it some more and make it deadlier, but Trump tipped their hand, so they went with what they had. On the other hand, it seems all they needed for their plan to work was some new disease that they could fearmonger and then implement injections as a control procedure.
“...obviously constructed by man...”
Can you provide the proof backing this claim up? The article above didn’t. They just assumed it’s true because they said it couldn’t occur naturally. All these statements require an actual, isolated, real virus - not a computer generated model. Which no one seems to have.
Even the test used to base this entire Scamdemic on can’t even identify this supposed virus. If the virus was, indeed isolated, then the test would be accurate, but it’s not, therefore there is no isolation.
Furthermore, the mockingbird media doesn’t need a “real” virus to fan the flame of fear. They can conjure up the idea that there is a real virus out there killing people out of thin air and blast that message at us 24/7 until we all start believing it (think Wag the Dog). Don’t forget, the flu disappeared. The cold....gone.
I def agree with you that Trump forced their hand and probably rushed them. I don’t think they had what they wanted yet. Then decided to run with the “Novel virus killing everybody” narrative. They couldn’t allow Trump to win again. But they definitely didn’t need a real virus to accomplish instilling fear into the world in order to set them up for the real kill shot.
I was speaking on the basis of a lot of things I've read over the past nearly two years, not one particular scientific study that I can recover and produce for you.
If it couldn't occur naturally, how else would it happen? Have you seen all the reports about Fauci funding gain-of-function research? What do you think that was all about?
"If it couldn't occur naturally, how else would it happen?"
It sounds like you're still stuck in the false dichotomy. Why isn't it a viable option that "covid" doesn't exist and that the flu and the cold were hijacked, coupled with a media marketing campaign of epic proportions, and every other angle of lies they've pushed, to create the mass panic?
Once this option is eliminated, then you have a true "If not this, then that" dichotomy.
"Have you seen all the reports about Fauci funding gain-of-function research? What do you think that was all about?"
Good question. Yes, I have. What we see, however, is merely all the "attempts" and investments made into GoF research, but we haven't seen any cold hard facts regarding their succeeding.
If "covid" was, indeed, isolated, then the man made sequences would be EASILY exposed, but those man made sequences have not been exposed - only from a computer generated model, not an actual, isolated virus sample.
I think Trump forced their hand for sure - in more ways than one. One of those ways was in the fact that they didn't have the actual virus ready yet (another reason for wanting 5 more years of lockdowns). So they had there little Event 201 round table meeting, and moved forward with their "simulated" pandemic. This, at minimum, explains why there haven't been any Flu deaths or Cold deaths (the death counts were hijacked and moved over to the "covid" column), and all the inflated numbers, incentivized doctors, faulty tests, etc etc...
Good discussion, Fren. :)
"It sounds like you're still stuck in the false dichotomy. Why isn't it a viable option that "covid" doesn't exist and that the flu and the cold were hijacked, coupled with a media marketing campaign of epic proportions, and every other angle of lies they've pushed, to create the mass panic?"
I know an ER doc who, in the early days of the virus, talked about symptoms he'd never seen before, especially blood clots in the lungs, which led to the use of ventilators. He acknowledged that comorbidities made a significant contribution to the patient's outcome. He initially seemed stumped by what they were seeing and later said they had to come up with a new protocol to treat it: Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and a third item, which IIRC was zinc.
I agree that Trump forced their hand, that the flu and cold were hijacked, that the media campaign created the public reaction of absolute fear and terror, and that the pandemic was simulated (hoaxed). However, based on the ER doc's experience, I believe that some new disease has been floating around, that it was likely created in a lab, that it's relatively harmless to anyone healthy, and that, just like the regular flu, it's only a significant problem for someone whose body is already debilitated by comorbidities and/or a weakened immune system. I also believe that the deaths of the relatively young and otherwise healthy who've gone to a hospital with this disease are a result of the Remdesivir and ventilator treatments being inflicted on them by corrupt practitioners at all levels of the system.
If I didn't know this ER doc, I'd probably agree with you 100%. I do agree that this has been a good discussion. 😺
Blood clots in the Lungs and H1N1:
https://vascular.org/news-advocacy/jvs-report-swine-flu-and-respiratory-distress-linked-blood-clots
Blood clotting with RSV's is not that surprising:
https://www.wired.com/story/covid-19s-scary-blood-clots-arent-that-surprising/
Your Dr friend would have to show how/why the clotting he is seeing is different than the clotting that has already been witnessed in already existing coronaviruses and influenza illnesses.
Classic false dichotomy.
Either A or B, when in fact there is a C
A = occurred naturally
B = man made
C = doesn’t exist was never isolated (the flu and common cold were hijacked, coupled with a media propaganda push of epic proportions, plus paying drs to code for “covid,” fabricated death certificate etc...)