Ironic they want to take this away considering they're the same people who use the Universally recognized freedom of movement" right as the reason why South African needs to remove walls from the gated communities, so that the poor can also "be safe and travel" to these areas.
You think I'm exaggerating but this really was the case years back, when "human rights activists" were using the below declaration as reasoning for the above idea:
Freedom of movement, mobility rights, or the right to travel is a human rights concept encompassing the right of individuals to travel from place to place within the territory of a country, and to leave the country and return to it. The right includes not only visiting places, but changing the place where the individual resides or works.
Such a right is provided in the constitutions of numerous states, and in documents reflecting norms of international law. For example, Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts that:
"Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state."
"Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country."[3]
Ironic they want to take this away considering they're the same people who use the Universally recognized freedom of movement" right as the reason why South African needs to remove walls from the gated communities, so that the poor can also "be safe and travel" to these areas.
You think I'm exaggerating but this really was the case years back, when "human rights activists" were using the below declaration as reasoning for the above idea:
Australians have been denied the right to leave the country for 18 months now.
They have 5km travel restrictions imposed. They can't leave their local government areas.
They can't travel within those 5kms after 9pm and before 5am.
Governments do not care about human rights charters. If they decide to do something, they will. Guns or no guns.