Is this problematic? Thatโs exactly what a scientist would say. He doesnโt know. Thatโs fine. Scientists arenโt gods. They sometimes have to look at things before answering questions with any authority. Research. So forth.
The fact that you don't know how the human immune system works on even the most basic levels is a true testament to whatever shithole you were educated from.
You mean a doctor that is charged with handling infectious disease policy for an entire country has not read up on 100 years of existing research on natural immunity? Thatโs his fucking job. There has never ever been a time where vaccine-induced immunity was superior to natural immunity. Pair that with the Israel data and itโs pretty damn clear whatโs going on here.
Yeah, he should have read the damned report, and I'll bet he did, just hoping not too many others did. Reaction to this BS says, "This answer is misleading. The Israeli researchers specifically addressed the durability of natural immunity compared to vaccine immunity, writing that their study demonstrated "natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant" than does the two-dose Pfizer vaccine."
I think the worry right now is that if the experts come out and say that natural immunity is as good or better than the vaccine on the basis of a few studies, the result will be anti-vax people deliberately exposing themselves and their children to the virus in order to avoid getting vaccinated. Similar to the chicken-pox parties.
Do you disagree that is a possibility should the medical experts jump the gun on this?
Is this problematic? Thatโs exactly what a scientist would say. He doesnโt know. Thatโs fine. Scientists arenโt gods. They sometimes have to look at things before answering questions with any authority. Research. So forth.
Not basic questions that studies havenโt been able to answer definitively yet.
This is a new virus, and itโs vaccines have only been out for a few months.
He could just make shit up or guesstimate, as you guys tend to think he does anyway, but he didnโt.
Which, again, is how science works. When you donโt know an answer to a good question, you say, โthatโs a good question. I donโt know.โ
The fact that you don't know how the human immune system works on even the most basic levels is a true testament to whatever shithole you were educated from.
He knows the answer. He just doesn't want to say it.
Natural immunity is as good or better but God forbid you don't toe the company line
He's a clown.
You mean a doctor that is charged with handling infectious disease policy for an entire country has not read up on 100 years of existing research on natural immunity? Thatโs his fucking job. There has never ever been a time where vaccine-induced immunity was superior to natural immunity. Pair that with the Israel data and itโs pretty damn clear whatโs going on here.
Crystal now isnโt it.?
Consequences need to be in short order
u/#Ummwhat
There really is no pile of shit from the TV that you will refuse to eat, is there?
Not if itโs starring Benedict Cumberbatch, no.
A retarded 10-year-old with 30 minutes of relevant instruction could tell you the correct answer.
Yeah, he should have read the damned report, and I'll bet he did, just hoping not too many others did. Reaction to this BS says, "This answer is misleading. The Israeli researchers specifically addressed the durability of natural immunity compared to vaccine immunity, writing that their study demonstrated "natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant" than does the two-dose Pfizer vaccine."
I think the worry right now is that if the experts come out and say that natural immunity is as good or better than the vaccine on the basis of a few studies, the result will be anti-vax people deliberately exposing themselves and their children to the virus in order to avoid getting vaccinated. Similar to the chicken-pox parties.
Do you disagree that is a possibility should the medical experts jump the gun on this?