8
electricboogaloo 8 points ago +9 / -1

Cause the crime stats are real and those crimes affect normal people in very real ways.

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

From the article you sent:

The relationship between Yahweh and his people is not moral, but strictly contractual and legalistic. According to Jewish scholar Yeshayahu Leibowitz, “The Torah does not recognize moral imperatives stemming from knowledge of natural reality or from awareness of man’s duty to his fellow man. All it recognizes are Mitzvot, divine imperatives.”[3] The hundreds of mitzvot (“commandments”) are ends in themselves, not ways to a higher moral consciousness.

This is true and important. It sets Christianity apart from other religions in the same way it sets Judaism apart.

The author (who is not a Christian) argues what he believes religion should be and argues that Yahweh doesn’t fit that definition, and thus is bad. His definition of religion is essentially humanism. This quote gets to the heart of that humanism, specifically “awareness of man’s duty to his fellow man”, “ways to a higher consciousness”, and “moral imperatives stemming from knowledge of natural reality”. These are humanist concepts. That man can get to God or become God through man’s own actions. The entire point of the legalistic law in the OT is to demonstrate that man cannot get to God on his own. Jesus repeats this. Paul repeats this. It was to demonstrate that we all fall short of the glory of God. No man could be perfect under God’s law. Jesus’ death is the only way to get to God. Without the law there is no sin. If the wages of sin are not death then Jesus didn’t need to die. This article speaks the truth but misses the point because the author’s religion is humanism. Humanism is the religion of Satan. Satan said to Eve, “You can become like God, knowing Good from Evil”. The idea is exactly what the author quoted, “moral imperatives stemming from knowledge of natural reality”. A man “knows” and chooses what is good and what is evil, not God. Man makes the law, not God. Man crowns himself God. This is humanism. Of course humanism hates Yahweh, who created the law. Humanism leads to the clown world we now experience because truth is relative to the changing human experience under humanism. Humans are god under this religion, which is antithetical to the law and Jesus’ death to cover our sins against the law.

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus said, Nobody comes to the Father except through me. The Father demands justice because he is a just God. He said the wages of sin are death. That’s a promise he made and he keeps his promises. That’s why Christ had to die! OT and NT are antithetical in nature because Jesus paid the price of death for justice. The death you see in the OT was conquered by Christ. Jesus and the apostles went to great lengths to demonstrate the connection of Jesus being sent by the God of the OT. It’s not reverse engineering the OT to say the OT God is the same God the Father in the NT, it is simply believing the words Jesus and his disciples spoke. Jesus said he was fulfilling what was written in the OT. To say the OT is a myth and the OT God isn’t real is calling Christ a liar. If Christ is a liar as you are saying then he is a sinner just like every other man and there’s nothing special about him. This is what the Jews believe. Christians believe he was sent by the God of the OT to be the sacrifice required by God’s justice. The Jews reject Christ as the Messiah.

I recommend reading Ron Wyatt’s story about searching for the Ark of the Covenant. It’s a great story unto itself, but it also connects dots between OT and NT using archeological evidence at the moment of Jesus’ death that perfectly ties together the death in the OT and Jesus’ death as the final sacrifice - https://www.ronwyatt.com/new_written_account.html

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course the Jews view the OT different. They rejected the capstone which was Jesus, as prophesied in their text. Of course the Jews attacked the early church more so than even the Romans did. It says so in the NT.

You have not answered my question. It’s an important question: Jesus said he fulfilled what was written in the Old Testament. Why would the true God fulfill the prophecies of a false god? How do you reconcile all the connections Jesus purposely makes to the OT? You make a differentiation between Yahweh and God the Father, but how? Jesus doesn’t make this differentiation? He doesn’t point out that the Jews worship a volcano God, quite the opposite he connects himself to the God of the OT many times.

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus celebrated the Passover and said “do this in remembrance of me” clearly connecting the Passover lamb to himself. Passover looked forward to Christ and backward to Egypt. God through the plague of the firstborn killed many Egyptians, and then led the Jews into the Promised Land to essentially commit genocide against its inhabitants. Jesus clearly made a connection between himself and that “sociopath” God as you say. Most Christians I know try to ignore the Old Testament cause they don’t understand the Old Testament, you just appear to take it a step further. An honest reading of the New Testament shows the Old and New Testaments don’t make any sense without each other. Jesus said he came to fulfill the Old Testament. Why would he fulfill the prophesies of a false god? Why would he look backward to the actions of a false god?

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

“God why have you forsaken me?” Was Jesus praying to himself?

2
electricboogaloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Without the Old Testament the New Testament makes no sense because Jesus fulfilled what was written in the Old Testament.

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s not what the data suggests.

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

This doesn’t make sense. Many others have said the same thing Trump said about the vax working and unvaxxed dying. Trump hasn’t broken any laws. Trump approved a EUA. He didn’t approve the vax, the FDA did that. He didn’t fake the clinical trial data, the pharma companies did that. He wasn’t paid by pharma to promote drugs without fair balance, many others did that. On what grounds do they arrest him? If they arrest him then how much more guilty do they all look? And what would that achieve for him or them? You could arrest Fauci or the CEO of Pfizer or any number of other people that pushed this fraud and the media would be forced to cover it. I don’t understand this theory.

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s a reality TV personality with killer PR instincts recruited by military intel for an operation. Many other conservative personalities appear to be similarly recruited. They play their parts and are the visible part of an massive war operation to counter a known threat. I believe the .win family is funded by this operation. Very little we see on the national stage is “real” on the right or left in the sense that normal people think about “real”. We are searching for truth within a psyop within a psyop within a psyop.

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did the message over the loudspeaker include the side effects? This is known as “fair balance” or “important safety information”. It is illegal to pay for a pharma ad which mentions the name of the drug AND the condition it treats in the same ad without “fair balance” - essentially reading the important safety information. This is why you hear all the side effects at the end of every commercial. Based on what you said this was 1) a paid ad by Pfizer, 2) included the brand name of the drug, 3) included the condition being treated, 4) did not include fair balance safety information. In normal times this means 9 figure fines and orange jumpsuits.

1
electricboogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

“you can’t find the truth”

“i got covid after getting the jab”

he found the truth but can’t accept it

3
electricboogaloo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agree on all points. I would add Operation Warp Speed accelerated their timeline by years relying on greed cause pharma can’t help themselves when billions are at stake.

3
electricboogaloo 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am friends with a wealthy Chinese national. Her father does a lot of business globally. He got the jab in the UK and then China forced him to get the Chinese jab to enter the country. China also forced him to renounce his British citizenship to keep his Chinese citizenship and passport.

2
electricboogaloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tell him your son is dying and you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the data is very solid. You hired the biggest medical malpractice law firm in the state to make sure he never practices medicine again if he refuses to give ivermectin. What’s it gonna be doc? How sure are you about that data?

view more: Next ›