So Let Me Ask
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (147)
sorted by:
explain that please.
the gov came in a snatched up all available cameras in hopes of finding evidence of what the fuck happened and who did it... they don't return it... it's all sitting in a box somewhere in a basement probably. either way lack of evidence isn't evidence.
there was a massive debris field in PA, they blamed it on wind but they found metal parts scattered all over that area... it's very mountainous out that way... near a couple ski resorts... there was debris everywhere and it only happens that way if the plane fell apart in the sky... from being blown the fuck up.
nobody says it has to melt, all you have to do is get it hot and hammer on it (force), it's how swords have been made for thousands of years.
180th ANG was in the air while the 4th plane was headed to DC... they are who shot it down.
you're assuming these "promoted people" were responsible... thats ridiculous. the people who did it were in the planes
the question was why iraq, the answer is violating multiple UN resolutions and running terrorist training camps and having WMD's, and having gas trucks, and gassing the kurds, and flying over the line he wasn't supposed to fly over... etc... etc... you can't say i'm wrong about the first half of the question because you were hoping i would answer the other half.
(you're not good at this)
Explain why WTC 7, if damaged in that bottom corner, and were to fall, did not topple, and instead came straight down? Unexplainable without demolition or at least explosives.
Cameras: who knows what's on it except those who have seen it.
PA flight 93 debris field? yes.. it's massive /s
More misdirection. floors 1-80 were built to hold the upper floors up. no fire was there, no fuel was there. why would they suddenly give way?
emergency crew was supposedly scrambled.
you're assuming that. people were promoted, and evidence points to it's likely they knew what was going on beforehand.
the question was why not Saudi Arabia. 'iraq is doing something we don't like so we went there instead' isn't valid.
(you're horrible at this)