647
posted ago by Tiger19 ago by Tiger19 +647 / -0

Every member of my air force reserve unit was given a written order to get the pfizer vax by October 3rd. We had to sign saying we acknowledge. 40% of my base, meaning 800 reservists recieved this order. Id be shocked if more than 100 actually get it. While at a meeting with the chaplains for religeous waivers, a military doctor came in. He couldnt answer a single question I asked nor could dispute a single fact I stated, almost all gathered from here. The 80 people in the meeting all believed the same as me but didnt have exact reporting numbers from VEARS nor exact info from other countries. Definitely caught a ton of looks and even had multiple groups come up to me for more info. I want to personally thank every single person on here that has posted covid related info on here. A lot of normies are awake or waking up and need guidence. You all provide it. Wwg1wga

Comments (120)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
33
corrbrick 33 points ago +33 / -0

Did you ask him where you could get an FDA approved BioNtech vaxx? We only have the Pfizer EUA vaxx in the US, and it's illegal to mandate that.

39
Tiger19 [S] 39 points ago +39 / -0

It was asked. Bs legal answer that they were the same. Lt col yelled out bullshit

26
test_pattern 26 points ago +26 / -0

in case you don't have these yet, they may be helpful:

Question: if the products are the same why did the FDA have to issue two separate letters, one each for Pfizer and BioNTech?

Answer: the FDA said the products are "legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

https://www.fda.gov/media/151733/downloadpage

see page 14: 4. NonclinicalPharmacology/Toxicology

"...a similar vaccine termed BNT162b2 (V8). COMIRNATY and BNT162b2 (V8) have identical amino acid sequences of the encoded antigens but COMIRNATY includes the presence of optimized codons to improve antigen expression."

apparently the "certain differences" are said to improve immunogenicity (antigen expression).

if the legal bs was so settled, then why did Senator Ron Johnson request clarification from the FDA? here's the letter (via children's defense fund):

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2021-08-26-Letter-to-FDA-re-Comirnaty.pdf

the FDA was supposed to have replied to Senator Johnson by August 30.

11
Fikkan 11 points ago +11 / -0

I can't sauce this, unfortunately, but this is the reason for FDA "approving" the European version of the vaccine.

Since the Marshal Plan post WW2, there has been a deal in place where if a foreign country (noncommunist at first, might have changed later, donno on that) goes through the FDA approval process for its drugs and meds, the US taxpayers will take on all costs re: research, development, and distribution for that med.

The only cost the foreign nation would have to cover itself is the actual making of the pills or injectables at the factory level.

This is financed by US citizens paying a "jewelers markup" of 800% for our own meds.

5
LetsGoFishing 5 points ago +5 / -0

I had no idea this was within the Marshall plan, but certainly not surprised. The unholy union of Rockefeller/Big Pharma had captured modern medicine for quite some time by 1948. If you haven't taken a look at the Morgenthau Plan that this supposedly replaced, take a look to see what seething anti-White hatred and plans for White genocide look like on paper. Eisenhower's death camps are fairly well exposed in James Bacque"s book Other Losses, which is why I say the Marshall Plan supposedly replaced the Morgenthau Plan. There used to be many first hand accounts on Youtube of US soldiers stationed at these camps speaking about the absolute brutality forced on the German civilians within them.

2
PaPatriot170 2 points ago +2 / -0

FDA link has been removed

1
MAG768720 1 point ago +1 / -0

FDA said the products are "legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

Next question: In what way are they "legally distinct?" Please be specific.

Their answer will be: I have no fucking clue. Of course, they will say it differently. KEK

2
ravonaf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Would that Lt. Col. happen to be a pilot?

2
Tiger19 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually not. There we multiple pilots present.

3
ravonaf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting. I firmly believe that when enough officers stand up and say no then they will take notice. Especially the pilots, as any blood clot symptoms will immediately ground them.

My son is currently active duty. As of a couple of days ago he said no one has said a word to him about the vaccine. I asked him what he was going to do when it came down. He said he honestly didn't know.

-1
PatriotSkorzeny -1 points ago +1 / -2

You don’t get to tell paper with type that’s it’s bull shit.

Then, LtKernel, see you at court martial. Then personal lawsuit. Then treason trials.

5
Wtf_socialismreally 5 points ago +5 / -0

While the veracity is dubious, if an order is illegal -- which these are -- you don't follow it.

To believe otherwise would mean we shouldn't be waiting for the military to help us