Flu cases from 2012 to 2021ššš
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
Thereās technically right and conceptually right, and this is the game Trump plays.
Say these numbers are technically wrong, good go and prove him wrong that it was actually 500,000 flu cases instead of 2000. Huge number difference. But the concept behind the argument stays the same. The drop in flu cases from any other year is astronomical and something is going on.
The media does this the opposite way, where small āerrorsā completely changes the argument.
I fully understand that, but I'm seeking the source. I deal in absolutes and factual information, not generalities and approximations of truth. Bottom line, I won't be sharing this image. Since no one here can back up the image, I can't use it.
Good approach. I get that if you canāt find the source of the data you wouldnāt want to use it, I wouldnāt either without knowing whrere it came from. I mean thatās exactly what the MSM does when they say āsources familiar with the matterā and āanonymous sourcesā.
So true, thanks.
Donāt you think itās a little disingenuous to share the wrong information to promote an idea? If the data itself makes your point, why not share the actual data?
If the info is accurate, and damming, then lefties will bury it. If itās even slightly incorrect theyāll share the shit out of it, which is the desired outcome.
When Trump wanted a Twitter message to reach as many people as possible he would misspell a word. The media would broadcast it far and wide, laughing about how heās so ignorant that he canāt even spell. His message then reached WAY more people than it otherwise would have. Checkmate.
Thatās fine and all but donāt most people now gather the reputation that the info being shared by that source is sloppy/incorrect?
Maybe more people see it, but do those people also take it seriously or are more people just making fun of it for being wrong?
It tricks them to actually look into it. First reaction is they're happy because they proved the meme wrong... but then they realize that it's only wrong by a small percentage, and the underlying sentiment remains (in this case that flu numbers fell off a cliff). People who get all their "info" from corrupt MSM probably never knew this, now they do.
Damn I wish I had my computer, I feel motivated to make this with the real figures just so I can share it.
Too bad my computer is like this pandemic, non-existent.
Not at all. Data is a snapshot, it is not the ātruthā. It is a simplification of what is actually happening so we can understand connections easier.
I wouldnāt be arguing a math problem, I would be arguing an idea, which is that health departments are manipulating numbers to count flu as covid. Those flu numbers themselves are wrong, there is no way of knowing how many people actually caught the flu.
Or are you even wrong if you say 38,000,000 vs 38,347,217? How about 2.10673 vs 2.11 vs 2? It depends on what is actually happening, and like I mentioned, numbers are just a simplification of the truth.
Data can be right or wrong though. If the snapshot you provide is incorrect and verifiably so then I donāt see how it helps.