Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse often mentions that the Washington Post is a mouthpiece for the CIA and State Department, NOT the Department of Defense or Whitehouse. With that in mind, I find this story very interesting as well. It sounds like a turf war between the CIA/State Dept and the DOD/"Whitehouse".
I think this may prove to be very inderdasting as well!
Yeah, and he says that, I forget the specifics, but NYT is the mouthpiece for the State Department, and CNN for Capitol Hill Dems? DOJ/FBI?
I donât doubt these assertions/details, but ultimately theyâre all Deep State, and theyâre all aligned against the people.
Also, tangentially, CTH/Sundance is the most conspicuously doomy place Iâve found on the conservative internet. Mention Durham there, and everybody seems to go into hysterical, ritualized fits of disappointment at that ânothingburger.â And I have to suspect any discussion of Q and/or devolution are banned there, as Iâve never seen mention of either. Now I could be missing something, as I admittedly donât spend much time on that site, but every time I do, I just feel sorry for those despairing doomers who have no idea whatâs brewing⊠because it appears nobody is allowed to tell them.
I first found CTH before the 2016 election and I have to say, Sundance is a phenomenal researcher. I learned more about SpyGate thanks to SD than anywhere else on the interenet.
He had put together all of his research and went to DC to present it and was totally shut down. I think that was extremely deflating for him. That's why no one wants to talk about Durham over there anymore.
When I found GA.win I found great people with great insights and I love how everyone contributes. CTH is on my list to check on occasion, but I agree, its become a little too doomy for me.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts BasedInFact.đđ» Always appreciated.
I recall that same episode, too. (There was some name he had for his truth bomb, something like the âbig uglyâ, but that wasnât it⊠anywaysâŠ)
Sounds like your progression is like mine.
I now think that one of the reasons why Sundance didnât get traction during those waning months of the Trump administration is that the time wasnât right for that damning info to come out - it is so much deeper than even Sundance suspected, and it will all come out when the time is right.
Absent âthe planâ (and the devolution scenario seems to describe what that might look like), nothing that has transpired makes sense. (And Iâm not just saying that as in âI donât like itâ, but just actorsâ actions, especially PDJTâs, donât make logical sense.) Iâm surprised someone astute and informed like Sundance doesnât at least critically consider these scenarios - it just seems like the notion of a âQ planâ is such a black swan that many wonât even consider it. People are so quick to dismiss it as fanciful that they wonât even consider that it is factual.
The IP addresses had never been sold or leased to the company, merely put under its control for the pilot program, created by an elite Pentagon unit known as the Defense Digital Service, which reports directly to the secretary of defense and bills itself as a âSWAT team of nerdsâ that solves emergency problems and conducts experimental work for the military.
But the Pentagon statement shed little new light on exactly what the pilot program was doing or why it now has ended. Itâs clear, though, that its mission has been extended even as it comes more formally under Pentagon control.
On the unusual timing of the start of the pilot program â which began the transfer of control of IP addresses at 11:57 a.m. on Inauguration Day, three minutes before President Biden took office â Goemaere added, âThe decision to launch and the scheduling of the DDS pilot effort was agnostic of administration change. The effort was planned and initiated in the Fall of 2020. It was launched in mid-January 2021 when the required infrastructure was in place. Given the opportunity, maintaining low visibility was also desirable in order to observe traffic in its current state, allowing us to identify potential vulnerabilities and assess and mitigate potential cyber threats.â
In April, Madory, a former Air Force officer, had come to believe the program was intended to collect intelligence. By announcing control of such a large section of the Internet â especially one the Pentagon had left mothballed for years â it likely was possible to reroute information flowing across the Internet to military networks for examination and analysis.
âThere are a lot of networks that inadvertently leak out vulnerabilities,â he said. âIâm sure theyâve been scooping that noise up for the past few months.â
Such tactics, he added, can allow cyberspies to discover weaknesses in the networks of adversaries or potentially detect evidence of how adversaries are surveilling your own networks, to help inform the creation of better defenses.
Madory shared one more tantalizing fact: His analysis of traffic flowing through the Internet addresses once controlled by Global Resource Systems are still leading to the same place as they have for most of the year â a computer router in Ashburn, Va., a major hub of Internet connections for government agencies and private companies â despite the official resumption of Pentagon control.
I can add no insight into whatâs transpiring here, but find it to be delightfully 5-star spicyđ¶.
Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse often mentions that the Washington Post is a mouthpiece for the CIA and State Department, NOT the Department of Defense or Whitehouse. With that in mind, I find this story very interesting as well. It sounds like a turf war between the CIA/State Dept and the DOD/"Whitehouse".
I think this may prove to be very inderdasting as well!
Yeah, and he says that, I forget the specifics, but NYT is the mouthpiece for the State Department, and CNN for Capitol Hill Dems? DOJ/FBI?
I donât doubt these assertions/details, but ultimately theyâre all Deep State, and theyâre all aligned against the people.
Also, tangentially, CTH/Sundance is the most conspicuously doomy place Iâve found on the conservative internet. Mention Durham there, and everybody seems to go into hysterical, ritualized fits of disappointment at that ânothingburger.â And I have to suspect any discussion of Q and/or devolution are banned there, as Iâve never seen mention of either. Now I could be missing something, as I admittedly donât spend much time on that site, but every time I do, I just feel sorry for those despairing doomers who have no idea whatâs brewing⊠because it appears nobody is allowed to tell them.
I agree with everything you say.
I first found CTH before the 2016 election and I have to say, Sundance is a phenomenal researcher. I learned more about SpyGate thanks to SD than anywhere else on the interenet.
He had put together all of his research and went to DC to present it and was totally shut down. I think that was extremely deflating for him. That's why no one wants to talk about Durham over there anymore.
When I found GA.win I found great people with great insights and I love how everyone contributes. CTH is on my list to check on occasion, but I agree, its become a little too doomy for me.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts BasedInFact.đđ» Always appreciated.
I recall that same episode, too. (There was some name he had for his truth bomb, something like the âbig uglyâ, but that wasnât it⊠anywaysâŠ)
Sounds like your progression is like mine.
I now think that one of the reasons why Sundance didnât get traction during those waning months of the Trump administration is that the time wasnât right for that damning info to come out - it is so much deeper than even Sundance suspected, and it will all come out when the time is right.
Absent âthe planâ (and the devolution scenario seems to describe what that might look like), nothing that has transpired makes sense. (And Iâm not just saying that as in âI donât like itâ, but just actorsâ actions, especially PDJTâs, donât make logical sense.) Iâm surprised someone astute and informed like Sundance doesnât at least critically consider these scenarios - it just seems like the notion of a âQ planâ is such a black swan that many wonât even consider it. People are so quick to dismiss it as fanciful that they wonât even consider that it is factual.
And thanks for the compliment. Likewise right back at you!
Dasting indeed!