thats what my buddy said his work is doing, sending him home everyday instead of firing cause he said he knows that they know that they cant fire anyone. he seems pretty determined, we'll see
In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong
Sep 14
by Jon Rappoport
In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” [1] under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this:
“Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical or autopsy specimen using a molecular amplification test.”
The test referred to is the PCR. And as you can plainly see, it is detecting, not the virus itself, but a piece of RNA.
A piece of RNA ASSUMED to come from the virus, SARS-CoV-2.
I say ASSUMED because, where is the actual virus? Where is the virus isolated from all surrounding material?
If you don’t have an isolated specimen of the virus, you can’t say, with any degree of certainty at all, that you have a piece of it (the RNA).
As I’ve described many times [2], “isolated” is a term that is tortured by researchers, so that it means just the opposite of what it is supposed to mean.
Numerous studies that claim the virus has been isolated actually turn out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains various types of animal and humans cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and other genetic material. The virus is completely surrounded, but it is there. We know this, because some of the cells are dying, and this dying must be the result of infection with the virus…”
This argument not only turns the definition of “isolation” on its head, it reveals, upon a moment’s consideration, that the dying of the cells could come from the action of the toxic chemicals and drugs; and on top of that, the cells are being starved of nutrients, so they could be dying as a result of that deprivation.
Therefore, to say “the virus must be in the soup in the dish in the lab” because is killing cells…well, this is completely unproven, and therefore…
There is no reason under the sun to claim that the virus is there in the soup at all.
Hence, the claim that the PCR test is detecting a piece of RNA from the virus is unwarranted. Because, again…where is the virus? Where is the truly isolated virus?
NOWHERE.
And on that basis alone, the PCR test is irrelevant, useless, and deceptive.
It is set up to look for and detect a piece of RNA material that has never been proved to come from this un-isolated phantom ASSUMPTION, called “SARS-CoV-2.”
A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science” that leads to the lockdowns and the economic devastation is not science at all.
It is what is called, in the intelligence community, a cover story. A story launched to justify crimes.
Question everything. What makes you think the swab makers aren't putting something on the swabs that go far up your nose when they test? Where do the swabs come from? Who benefits from positive results? Not you.
Horrible plan. My Dr. told me that any more than 2 PCR swabs and you risk cancer in the next 5 years due to the harmful ingredients the cotton is drenched in.
There is a reason why continuous testing is on par with the vax. Both lead to the same result… ☠️
Do not consent to medical experimentation or medical testing that you do not want.
Today it’s a pcr test. Once the prescedent is set, they can start forcing you to do other medical tests and then discriminate based on the results of those tests.
Unfortunately...you are NOT safe if they use the PCR tests with the unsafe swabs.
thats what my buddy said his work is doing, sending him home everyday instead of firing cause he said he knows that they know that they cant fire anyone. he seems pretty determined, we'll see
In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong Sep 14 by Jon Rappoport In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” [1] under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this:
“Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical or autopsy specimen using a molecular amplification test.”
The test referred to is the PCR. And as you can plainly see, it is detecting, not the virus itself, but a piece of RNA.
A piece of RNA ASSUMED to come from the virus, SARS-CoV-2.
I say ASSUMED because, where is the actual virus? Where is the virus isolated from all surrounding material?
If you don’t have an isolated specimen of the virus, you can’t say, with any degree of certainty at all, that you have a piece of it (the RNA).
As I’ve described many times [2], “isolated” is a term that is tortured by researchers, so that it means just the opposite of what it is supposed to mean.
Numerous studies that claim the virus has been isolated actually turn out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains various types of animal and humans cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and other genetic material. The virus is completely surrounded, but it is there. We know this, because some of the cells are dying, and this dying must be the result of infection with the virus…”
This argument not only turns the definition of “isolation” on its head, it reveals, upon a moment’s consideration, that the dying of the cells could come from the action of the toxic chemicals and drugs; and on top of that, the cells are being starved of nutrients, so they could be dying as a result of that deprivation.
Therefore, to say “the virus must be in the soup in the dish in the lab” because is killing cells…well, this is completely unproven, and therefore…
There is no reason under the sun to claim that the virus is there in the soup at all.
Hence, the claim that the PCR test is detecting a piece of RNA from the virus is unwarranted. Because, again…where is the virus? Where is the truly isolated virus?
NOWHERE.
And on that basis alone, the PCR test is irrelevant, useless, and deceptive.
It is set up to look for and detect a piece of RNA material that has never been proved to come from this un-isolated phantom ASSUMPTION, called “SARS-CoV-2.”
A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science” that leads to the lockdowns and the economic devastation is not science at all.
It is what is called, in the intelligence community, a cover story. A story launched to justify crimes.
In this case, capital crimes against humanity.
I've been saying this for several months.
Do you have a link for those quotes?
thx
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/09/14/in-case-you-thought-the-pcr-test-detects-an-actual-virus-wrong/?fbclid=IwAR1LGaWXaLa67qMG7DBBzVsrCSHwvOSx9Lpganw1Ouhp7hl16tDvLJ8jz7E
was thinking about this when i said it
lhttps://youtu.be/jw7ajsKmbd4?t=70
Question everything. What makes you think the swab makers aren't putting something on the swabs that go far up your nose when they test? Where do the swabs come from? Who benefits from positive results? Not you.
They’ll infect you one way or another.
Until they make you positive and drag your ass to the camp. pass
Its been said the tests are tainted.
And what will you do when eventually come up with flase positive.
Not only would I take the test but I'd print out and hand out all the info from CDC and test maker of how faulty the test is.
That is a big NO from me. EO on the tips of the swabs alone can do harm if exposed to it weekly over a a long period of time.
Plus the swabs are not cotton swabs and are often made of harder material which will cause damage to your soft tissues inside your nasal cavity.
the test is a possible risk. DO NOT COMPLY
Horrible plan. My Dr. told me that any more than 2 PCR swabs and you risk cancer in the next 5 years due to the harmful ingredients the cotton is drenched in. There is a reason why continuous testing is on par with the vax. Both lead to the same result… ☠️
Spit tests only.
No. 1 air line is financially penalizing unvaxxed $200 per month starting Nov 1
They are going to be bankrupt soon. They are just going for a last minute money grab.
Do not consent to medical experimentation or medical testing that you do not want.
Today it’s a pcr test. Once the prescedent is set, they can start forcing you to do other medical tests and then discriminate based on the results of those tests.
Stop complying.
How about I don't let them put ANYTHING in my body.
was thinking about this when i said it
lhttps://youtu.be/jw7ajsKmbd4?t=70