This is an old fight for the business records and communications of the auditors, started by local Soros groups, i.e. the newspaper and the SoS. Not our friends and not "the audit."
It's not the audit. However, if this quote is to be believed...
The Arizona Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an effort by the state Senate to keep secret records of its ongoing review of the 2020 election in Maricopa County that are in the possession of the contractors conducting the recount.
Wouldn't the ability to see all of this information include audit information?
It's certainly possible that you're more on top of the news than azfamily.com! It was the first I saw it so I posted it. Thanks for the feedback Q20191776.👈🏻
This reads like it's just another ""HIT PIECE"", with the direct intention to debunk the AZAUDIT, before the results are released by the AZ Senate to the public....
The Senate has the full power over the audit, and Judges can say whatever they want, they cannot ORDER the Senate to DO anything, that is NOT part of their Jurisdiction....
My analysis of this HIT PIECE, leads me to believe these ""JUDGES"" are in cahoots with MCBOE, or may be straight up RINOS if not Demonrats.....
And how is it that the Arizona Supreme Court has not made a ruling regarding the lawful subpoenas that have been IGNORED by Maricopa election officials to turn over election passwords and servers?
That's why they went to court. I think it's just info on how how the audit was funded. I remember they wanted info on the processes the company used. CN said it was work product or something and got sued. Now they have to s how it.
This is an old fight for the business records and communications of the auditors, started by local Soros groups, i.e. the newspaper and the SoS. Not our friends and not "the audit."
It's not the audit
It's not the audit. However, if this quote is to be believed...
Wouldn't the ability to see all of this information include audit information?
I am pretty sure it's the Cyber Ninja policies, payment, etc.
Interesting timing. Right after California recall.
Is this old news?
The story was posted 15 hours ago.
Oh. I thought I had read about this court ruling a few days ago.
It's certainly possible that you're more on top of the news than azfamily.com! It was the first I saw it so I posted it. Thanks for the feedback Q20191776.👈🏻
This reads like it's just another ""HIT PIECE"", with the direct intention to debunk the AZAUDIT, before the results are released by the AZ Senate to the public....
The Senate has the full power over the audit, and Judges can say whatever they want, they cannot ORDER the Senate to DO anything, that is NOT part of their Jurisdiction....
My analysis of this HIT PIECE, leads me to believe these ""JUDGES"" are in cahoots with MCBOE, or may be straight up RINOS if not Demonrats.....
Interesting perspective. Thanks for sharing HOSEQ.👈🏻
Thanks... But in all fairness, what I wrote surprised me too.....
Why would they wanna keep secret records of this? What are they hiding
There's a RINO behind every MAGA.
And how is it that the Arizona Supreme Court has not made a ruling regarding the lawful subpoenas that have been IGNORED by Maricopa election officials to turn over election passwords and servers?
I believe AG Brnovich has issued a statement that Maricopa County needs to turn over the servers or lose their funding.
https://www.azag.gov/press-release/ag-brnovich-maricopa-county-must-comply-senates-legislative-subpoena-or-forfeit-state
That's why they went to court. I think it's just info on how how the audit was funded. I remember they wanted info on the processes the company used. CN said it was work product or something and got sued. Now they have to s how it.