So, it's possible that Durham still has some major indictments to come that will embroil major Democratic figures. Until Durham closes his probe, that still can't be ruled out. -- But prosecutors tend to lead with their strongest stuff first. And if this is the strongest stuff that Durham has, that's pretty thin gruel.
The fact that they put the "honest" part of the article at the end, and still gave it a personal slight on the way out the door, really highlights the slimy nature of "journalism" we have all come to expect from CNN.
At the end of the article :
Depends.
If the infestation is small, you start with the strongest stuff.
If the infestation is deep, you start with the weakest link.
Regardless of process, it's conjecture.
The fact that they put the "honest" part of the article at the end, and still gave it a personal slight on the way out the door, really highlights the slimy nature of "journalism" we have all come to expect from CNN.