What kind of fuckery is this??????
(twitter.com)
Comments (30)
sorted by:
The kind that desperately needs sources. Half of these look like they were props created for Stargate or something.
Oh, I loved that show. But because it was entertaining, not because it was diving deeply into the evidence and conducing a rigorous academic examination of the topic. It wasn't good about providing sources, either.
For instance, I have no idea how to search for the "tentacle monster rune slab" that they show without a source in this clip. I'm betting it's a prop for a show. But I have no idea, because I'm not even sure how to research it, and figure it'd take way more time than it's worth.
I really liked the show too, but he was too quick to get to the point of it had to be aliens.
There are really only a small handful of pieces where you look at them and there's no feasible way to recreate it even with modern technology.
At least you not abused us comparing to them this time ;)
But yes,unfortunately if even 10% of this would be credible it is looking like cycle. It is not about "aliens" probably,but it looks there might be cycle... And it scares me.
Imagine idea what would happen if some totalitarian leaders would move all people they wanted to control on one continent "to protect environment" (really doing it because of centralization of power). Keeping all eggs in one basket...
People who lead believe they are smart,but usually they do dumb decisions...
This is interesting from a research point of view- he seems to have objects from early paleo-sanskrit civilisations and draws some interesting conclusions. Obviously due to subject matter all these claims would be disputed by mainstream science. but he makes very convincing points.
http://www.human-resonance.org/A1_Psychoacoustics_&_Earth_Resonance.pdf
Items from the Illinois Archive:
http://www.human-resonance.org/illinois_archive.html
The whole site is interesting, some pretty far-fetched subject matter interestingly explained.
http://www.human-resonance.org
"Chariots of the Gods" or the author would know many or most of the specific origins / sourcing.
I'm not familiar with all and there wasn't distinction on what was ancient or recreation or modern similar shaped equipment.
Agreed, especially the nokia cellphone looks way too good to be real.
Unfortunately unlikely to know which elements are real or fake.
It's a good cover then when someone discusses the real version it's met with, "you saw that on that TV show."
Indeed.
π΅π¦π’π'π€ π©π’π΄ π¦π―π΅π¦π³π¦π₯ π΅π©π¦ π€π©π’π΅
Our entire history as we've been taught is a lie. If you're interested in finding out more check out videos by Jon Levi. He gets into US and worldwide buildings and structures and how there's no way the could have been built the way we've been told.
7.46 is a cyclops, no?
Yes, in the Ankh shape I think, I've seen that on engravings too. Just pondering, cyclops were talked about in some areas of history as if they were factual not legend (likely allegory in my mind, opening the 'central eye' completely perhaps). On the purse, I think you're up the right tree with portable power, the tesla coil in the video seems to bolster that thought. Lots of energy in all of the world's pyramids once upon a time.
http://www.human-resonance.org/visoko.html
We're not the first human sub-race to have somewhat advanced tech and we won't be the last.
The helicopter in the Egyptian temple has been explained a long time ago. Just like the "light bulb".
What was interesting was the experiment that recreated the bulb with a "Baghdad battery" and it produced light.
What's interesting is the number 17 in the circle above the front tire.
Good eye.
Wow !
A lot of these i have seen before. But the fact that some of them I haven't seen...
Right, I mean it's not like a spoke wheel was not invented in use [/Sarcasm][/End Thread]
Ancient βaliensβ / human tech is real but half of these are fakes.
No Way. Does anyone have a source for the computer desktop at 0:15 ?