BillMitchell: Bad week for the Vax. - The Great Awakening

434

BillMitchell: Bad week for the Vax.

posted 3 years ago by undine53 3 years ago by undine53 +434 / -0

First FDA declines the booster then New England Journal of Medicine declares it not safe for pregnant women.

It's almost like it's a very dangerous experimental drug...

Meanwhile Ivermectin cured India.

43 comments

43 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (43)

sorted by:

▲ 13 ▼

– EJay_Scott 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Anyone got the source from the New England Journal of Medicine declaring it unsafe for pregnant women? Need to show it to a family member. Thanks in advance.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 19 ▼

– _thorn_ 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

I think it's linked here https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/new-england-journal-medicine-backtracks-now-admits-covid-vax-may-not-safe-pregnant-women/

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1

▲ 0 ▼

– Dreadnought61 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Page 2341 I believe..

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -7 ▼

– deleted -7 points 3 years ago +2 / -9

▲ 7 ▼

– ProphetOfKek 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

“In the third trimester” is key there.

It also cautions and says we need more data. It is impossible to say it is safe yet. Mr handshake.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -6 ▼

– deleted -6 points 3 years ago +1 / -7

▲ 9 ▼

– Picador20 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

There is a world of difference between proclaiming a drug to be safe and proclaiming that its dangers are as yet unknown.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

▲ 4 ▼

– Letsroll2021 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

It’s dangerous to say it’s safe when the time consuming studies required for that adjective haven’t been completed... (or started?)

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

▲ 1 ▼

– UnderCoverTrumper 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Lol. I'm the person who thinks we should REQUIRE experimental drugs JUST IN CASE they MIGHT be safe.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q