Is Dr Shiva basically saying this ballots were PRE-PRINTED with "verified and approved" ALREADY on it??? They are BEHIND the triangle ffs!
👨🏫 AUDIT AUDIT AUDIT 🛠️
What am I even hearing right now?
Are there any legitimate reasons for this or is it a nothingburger and I am getting overexcited for nothing?
This is probably debunked, it's far from a critical point, Dr Shiva even said himself he wants to know why it happened, this is probably the answer https://twitter.com/RCflier925/status/1441506438543659018?s=20
Focus on all the other stuff, this is speculative and easily explainable without any fraud involved.
Why are you getting downvotes? ****guys be careful ****
i don't even know why this is stickied, Shiva mentioned it for like 10 seconds and said he doesn't know why this happens and it's odd and he wants an answer from maricopa county...
If they listened to what he said he was much more convinced that it was a legitimate technical process he didn't know about than something malicious. sigh this board sometimes, post title is easy to misinterpret, the answer to OP headline is "no" lol
morons or shills trying to push a conspiracy theory to distract from the indisputable instances of crime and fraud... ffs xD guess we'll get a proper answer in due time, maybe in 2 weeks after they go around telling people about how they can't even photoshop the fraud properly and make fools of themselves das a yoikes from me.
Yeah I was going to say there must be something on the triangles that stop the scan or make it non readable, but I could have sworn I saw other examples where the stamp was over top of the triangle.... maybe I was wrong.
The triangle on top is red, not black, so the stamp would be discernible.
the stamp will show up over the triangle on the original ballot if you saw it IRL or took a picture of it but on the duplicate ballot image it won't.
Yeah, I mean I figure it was probably something simple. If I was going to forge election ballots, it wouldn't make sense to go through the trouble and leave a mistake like that which is very obvious.
yeah exactly, meanwhile all the fact checkers will use it as deeboonk material and the "conspiracy theorists" will claim it's overlooked photoshop layering lmao, effectively ignoring every other point of fraud that is confirmed....