Not quite.
XOXOGG explains it below, as Cyberninjas explained it yesterday, there are two distinctly different meanings of duplicate ballots. The ones where they were unreadable and, per guidelines, duplicated, were examined and not found to be an issue.
What Dr. Shiva talked about were multiple ballots sent and returned for the same voter ID.
I don't think that's what Shiva is saying.
He pointed this out to indicate that BOTH ballots were counted.
Meaning that if the 1st ballot was unreadable. A second ballot was created. But they counted both ballots anyways.
Why else would he point this out?
Not quite. XOXOGG explains it below, as Cyberninjas explained it yesterday, there are two distinctly different meanings of duplicate ballots. The ones where they were unreadable and, per guidelines, duplicated, were examined and not found to be an issue. What Dr. Shiva talked about were multiple ballots sent and returned for the same voter ID.