Not quite.
XOXOGG explains it below, as Cyberninjas explained it yesterday, there are two distinctly different meanings of duplicate ballots. The ones where they were unreadable and, per guidelines, duplicated, were examined and not found to be an issue.
What Dr. Shiva talked about were multiple ballots sent and returned for the same voter ID.
Wrong. That is one type of duplicate ballot. The duplicate ballot the Cyber Ninja's talked about is the remaking a ballot that is too big or unreadable.
Dr. Shiva talked about voters that had more than one ballot.
The Cyber Ninja's were very clear about the same term being used for two different things at the beginning of their presentation.
For a duplicated ballot they are to reject one. Here they did not. They counted both. They passed all copies of the duplicated ballots through to signature verification, which we know they abandoned durring tabulation.
So, the general idea of a duplicate being illegal is a little off. Counting all copies is definately illegal, which is what was shown.
Well how about you explain it to us window lickers?
Since you apparently know everything.
I don't think that's what Shiva is saying.
He pointed this out to indicate that BOTH ballots were counted.
Meaning that if the 1st ballot was unreadable. A second ballot was created. But they counted both ballots anyways.
Why else would he point this out?
Not quite. XOXOGG explains it below, as Cyberninjas explained it yesterday, there are two distinctly different meanings of duplicate ballots. The ones where they were unreadable and, per guidelines, duplicated, were examined and not found to be an issue. What Dr. Shiva talked about were multiple ballots sent and returned for the same voter ID.
WRONG. That was the WHOLE POINT of what Shiva was saying. The duplicates and originals were ALL counted as if they were all legit votes.
This dude is correct.
Wrong. That is one type of duplicate ballot. The duplicate ballot the Cyber Ninja's talked about is the remaking a ballot that is too big or unreadable.
Dr. Shiva talked about voters that had more than one ballot.
The Cyber Ninja's were very clear about the same term being used for two different things at the beginning of their presentation.
For a duplicated ballot they are to reject one. Here they did not. They counted both. They passed all copies of the duplicated ballots through to signature verification, which we know they abandoned durring tabulation.
So, the general idea of a duplicate being illegal is a little off. Counting all copies is definately illegal, which is what was shown.