data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/059ed/059edc0968630c087f31436672b7345d2e457413" alt=""
TRUST THE PLAN. IT IS UNFOLDING. But, OK, bois and xirls, what's next in that plan? Indictments? Prosecutions in AZ? The audit still has things to drop that weren't presented, Friday. Do those come out, and then something else happens? What would that be? And Durham is rolling, does that accelerate?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b189/3b18983a43d310e6f181ae1e54320a1d2e7cf29d" alt=""
The Rosenbergs were not acting on behalf of an enemy that used a biological weapon on the US, which is an act of war according to chapter 6.9.
I didn't say the military is currently running the country.
You pointed out that I conflated the term belligerent with enemy combatant. There goes my whole theory!
You seem more interested in pulling things into the weeds instead of a good faith debate about a theory. Are you aware this is a Q forum?
The Rosenbergs were dealing in nuclear weapons. ...so much, much bigger threats than nuclear weapons.
You said this
I see now you were discussing the pretext for the military to run the country in your theory.
The conflation I was pointing out was the conflation between an individual and a country.
I'm pulling things to the weeds ???....in bad faith!?!.
I thought I was discussing the central point of your theory and why I think it's hopium